J Korean Radiol Soc.  2006 Oct;55(4):353-359. 10.3348/jkrs.2006.55.4.353.

Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Ulcers of the Stomach on Computed Tomography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Korea. kimsuk@medimail.co.kr
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Korea.
  • 3Department of General Surgery, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
We wanted to determine the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings for differentiating benign ulcers from malignant ones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
18 clinicopathologically proven benign ulcers that had been detected by both endoscopy and MDCT were the focus of this study. 26 ulcerative advanced gastric cancers and 26 early gastric cancers with ulceration, all of which had been surgically proven, were selected as a control group. Five of the 26 early gastric cancers that were confined to the mucosa and that were not detected on CT were excluded in this study. The following CT findings were reviewed by two radiologists; ulcer size, the degree of enhancement and the thickness of inner enhancing layer in the ulcer base, the total thickness and the enhancing inner layer thickness in the largest part of the thickened ulcer mound, the presence of ulcer that projected beyond the healthy lumen, and the presence of perigastric fat infiltration and perigastric lymphadenopathy.
RESULTS
An indiscernible thin-walled ulcer base (less than 1.5 mm) and suboptimal enhancement of the ulcer base for the discrimination of benign gastric ulcers from the malignant gastric ulcers showed sensitivities of 100% (18/18) and 78% (14/18), respectively, with specificities of 98% (46/47) and 92% (43/47), respectively. Ulcer projection was more significantly present in benign ulcer (13/18, 72%) than in the malignant gastric ulcers (7/47, 15%). The enhancing inner layer thickness in the ulcer mound was significantly greater in the AGC (mean: 7.4 mm) than in the benign gastric ulcers (mean, 2.2 mm). There were insignificant differences for ulcer size, total thickness of the ulcer mound, the perigastric fat infiltration and perigastric lymphadenopathy between the benign and malignant gastric ulcers.
CONCLUSION
MDCT is an additional helpful diagnostic tool when benign gastric ulcers are histologically difficult to distinguish from malignant gastric ones.

Keyword

Stomach, CT; Stomach, ulcer; Stomach, neoplasms

MeSH Terms

Discrimination (Psychology)
Endoscopy
Lymphatic Diseases
Mucous Membrane
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Stomach Neoplasms
Stomach Ulcer
Stomach*
Ulcer*
Full Text Links
  • JKRS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr