J Korean Med Assoc.  2013 Sep;56(9):778-783. 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.9.778.

Treating and preventing relapse of drug abuse by healthcare providers

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. momo0910@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

Drug abuse by healthcare providers is a serious public problem affecting not only the providers themselves but also their families, colleagues, and patients. It is not a new problem, but the medical community has historically been unwilling to accept and publicly acknowledge the problem, particularly a problem of its own members. Therefore, drug abuse by healthcare providers has either gone unnoticed or has been treated punitively, which has led to high prevalence and mortality. In South Korea, drug-abusing healthcare providers are considered criminals rather than patients. However, many studies have reported that punitive action alone is ineffective. This article describes the treatment principles, prognosis, and possibilities of returning to practice for drug-abusing healthcare providers. Early detection of drug abuse is key to subsequent treatment and prognosis. Furthermore, why relapse prevention as well as treatment is significant and which factors intensify the risk of relapse will be discussed. The use of opioids, coexisting psychiatric illness, and a family history of drug abuse are statistically significant factors. Finally, continuous and close monitoring is effective for relapse prevention, so it is considered another kind of therapy. An organized system for treating drug abuse is currently lacking in South Korea, not only for the general population but also for healthcare providers. In the future, a systematic approach and management by the medical community is necessary to resolve drug abuse by healthcare providers.

Keyword

Substance-related disorders; Healthcare personnel; Relapse prevention; Therapeutics

MeSH Terms

Analgesics, Opioid
Criminals
Delivery of Health Care
Health Personnel
Humans
Prevalence
Prognosis
Recurrence
Republic of Korea
Substance-Related Disorders
Analgesics, Opioid

Cited by  1 articles

Healthcare providers have to be careful with drug abuse in Korea
Jaemin Lee
J Korean Med Assoc. 2013;56(9):752-754.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.9.752.


Reference

1. Baldisseri MR. Impaired healthcare professional. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35:2 Suppl. S106–S116.
Article
2. The sick physician. Impairment by psychiatric disorders, including alcoholism and drug dependence. JAMA. 1973; 223:684–687.
3. Bosch X. Catalonia makes plans to help addicted doctors. Lancet. 1998; 352:1045.
Article
4. Berry CB, Crome IB, Plant M, Plant M. Substance misuse amongst anaesthetists in the United Kingdom and Ireland. the results of a study commissioned by the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2000; 55:946–952.
Article
5. Tyssen R. Health problems and the use of health services among physicians: a review article with particular emphasis on Norwegian studies. Ind Health. 2007; 45:599–610.
Article
6. Breiner SJ. The impaired physician. J Med Educ. 1979; 54:673.
Article
7. Carinci AJ, Christo PJ. Physician impairment: is recovery feasible? Pain Physician. 2009; 12:487–491.
8. Garcia-Guasch R, Roige J, Padros J. Substance abuse in anaesthetists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012; 25:204–209.
Article
9. Ross S. Identifying an impaired physician. Virtual Mentor. 2003; 5:DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2003.5.12.cprl1-0312.
Article
10. Morgenstern J, Kahler CW, Frey RM, Labouvie E. Modeling therapeutic response to 12-step treatment: optimal responders, nonresponders, and partial responders. J Subst Abuse. 1996; 8:45–59.
Article
11. Muhleman D. 12-Step study groups in drug abuse treatment programs. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1987; 19:291–298.
12. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF Jr. Aftercare in drug abuse treatment. Int J Addict. 1985; 20:917–945.
Article
13. Alpern F, Correnti CE, Dolan TE, Llufrio MC, Sill A. A survey of recovering Maryland physicians. Md Med J. 1992; 41:301–303.
14. Gallegos KV, Lubin BH, Bowers C, Blevins JW, Talbott GD, Wilson PO. Relapse and recovery: five to ten year follow-up study of chemically dependent physicians--the Georgia experience. Md Med J. 1992; 41:315–319.
15. DuPont RL, McLellan AT, White WL, Merlo LJ, Gold MS. Setting the standard for recovery: Physicians' Health Programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 36:159–171.
Article
16. Paris RT, Canavan DI. Physician substance abuse impairment: anesthesiologists vs. other specialties. J Addict Dis. 1999; 18:1–7.
17. Pelton C, Ikeda RM. The California Physicians Diversion Program's experience with recovering anesthesiologists. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1991; 23:427–431.
Article
18. Menk EJ, Baumgarten RK, Kingsley CP, Culling RD, Middaugh R. Success of reentry into anesthesiology training programs by residents with a history of substance abuse. JAMA. 1990; 263:3060–3062.
Article
19. Talbott GD, Martin CA. Relapse and recovery: special issues for chemically dependent physicians. J Med Assoc Ga. 1984; 73:763–769.
20. Domino KB, Hornbein TF, Polissar NL, Renner G, Johnson J, Alberti S, Hankes L. Risk factors for relapse in health care professionals with substance use disorders. JAMA. 2005; 293:1453–1460.
Article
21. Shore JH. The Oregon experience with impaired physicians on probation. An eight-year follow-up. JAMA. 1987; 257:2931–2934.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr