J Korean Surg Soc.  1998 Aug;55(2):160-166.

Significance of an Intraoperative Frozen Section of the Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node and the Preoperative PET Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Sung Kyun Kwan University, College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sung Kyun Kwan University, College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery,Seoul National University Hospital.
  • 4Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University.

Abstract

The axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor when deciding whether or not to treat breast cancer patients with adjuvant therapy and its status is determined by radical axillary lymph node dissection. Although radical axillary dissection is regarded as the gold standard for staging breast cancer, postoperative problems, such as lymphedema are considerable. However the same procedure is performed on all patients even in patients with no sign of axillary lymph node involvement. Recently, many trials that intend to determine the axillary status through more conservative procedures have been reported. This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography (PET) and sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND) for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. The sentinel node was studied with vital dye, isosulphan blue, to see if the sentinel node could predict axillary nodal status with accuracy. Eighteen patients (14 cases of radical mastectomy, 4 cases of conserving surgery) with breast cancer underwent axillary dissection, who had a preoperative PET and a successful intraoperative SLND for staging in the Department of Surgery at Samsung Medical Center from September 1995 to August 1996. PET imaging with the radiolabeled glucose analogue (F-18 FDG) was used to visualize the primary breast tumors. Sentinel lymphadenectomy was done under general anesthesia, and isosulphan blue was injected into the center of the mass and its margin. Axillary dissection was performed to identify any stained lymphatics. If stained lymphatics were identified, the dissection was extended along the lymphatics bidirectionally to detectthe stained lymph node nearest to the primary tumor (sentinel node). After frozen biopsy of the sentinel node, a routine axillary lymph node dissection was performed. Following this, the pathologic results of both specimens were compared. Out of all 18 cases, 6 cases had the sentinel node as the only positive node in the permanent pathologic results. Although the preliminary lymph node results were not positive in 3 patients who had undergone PET and in one patient who had undergone a frozen biopsy of the sentinel node, their actual permanent axillary nodes were later found to be positive. The sensitivity and the specificity of the sentinel node method and the PET method for detection of axillary lymph node metastases were 83% and 100% and 50% and 100%, respectively. A sentinel lymphadenectomy with multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining of the sentinel nodes increases the accuracy of axillary staging in breast cancer and can identify significantly more patients with 1ymph node metastases, especially micrometastases. The sentinel node method (SLND) can accurately predict the axillary nodal status in breast cancer patients. Therefore, a more conservative procedure can be performed on patients with negative sentinel node status, and routine axillary dissection can be omittend when possible in the future.

Keyword

Axillary dissection; Sentinel node; PET; Breast cancer

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia, General
Biopsy
Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Frozen Sections*
Glucose
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes*
Lymphedema
Mastectomy, Radical
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
Positron-Emission Tomography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Glucose
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr