J Korean Acad Periodontol.
2005 Dec;35(4):813-822. 10.5051/jkape.2005.35.4.813.
Clinical evaluation of Branemark Ti-Unite implant and ITI SLA implant in the post maxillary area with sinus elevation technique
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.
- 2Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Korea.
- 3Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Korea.
- 4Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.
- KMID: 1999695
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2005.35.4.813
Abstract
- The predictable outcome of implant placement in the atrophic maxilla with sinus floor elevation procedure(osteotome sinus floor elevation technique and window opening technique) is well documented. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Branemark Ti-Unite implant system and ITI SLA implant system placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus floor elevation procedure. Eighty patients received placement of Branemark Ti-Unite implants(195 implants) in their atrophic posterior Maxilla with sinus floor elevation procedure(153 osteotome sinus floor elevation technique and 42 window opening procedure). Fifty patients received placement of ITI SLA implants(83 implants) in their atrophic posterior Maxilla with sinus floor elevation procedure(77 osteotome sinus floor elevation technique and 6 window opening procedure). Chart review were taken from each patient. The total failed implants were seven and the total implant survival rate was 96.4% in Branemark Ti-Unite system. The total failed implants were one and the total implant survival rate was 98.8% in ITI SLA system. The implant survival rate with osteotome technique was 96% and 97.6% with window opening in Branemark Ti-Unite system. The implant survival rate with osteotome technique was 98.7% and 100% with window opening. The implant survival rate with osteotome technique was 96% and 97.6% with window opening in ITI SLA system. The results of this evaluation show that the placement of Branemark Ti-Unite system as well as ITI SLA system is a reasonable treatment option for patients with the atrophic posterior maxillary area.
Cited by 2 articles
-
A comparative clinical study on oxidized titanium implants and sandblasted large-grit acid etched implants in soft bone
Jun-Young Lee, Ji-Eun Song, Ui-Won Jung, Chang-Sung Kim, Seong-Ho Choi, Kyoo-Sung Cho
J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2009;39(Suppl):205-212. doi: 10.5051/jkape.2009.39.S.205.The retrospective study of survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation
Jeoung-A Yu, Sang-Min Lee, Mi-Kyung Yoo, Ui-Won Jung, Chang-Sung Kim, Seong-Ho Choi, Pil-Kyoo Park, Kyoo-Sung Cho
J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2009;39(3):293-301. doi: 10.5051/jkape.2009.39.3.293.
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- Radiographic evaluation of the proximal bone level between two implants: A 3-year comparative study between Branemark and ITI implants in the mandibular posterior region
- Implant Surgery with Both Sinus Bone Graft in the Maxillary edentulous patient: A Case Report
- Retrospective studies of dental implant placement at each intraoral site and situation
- Bone Added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Placement of Branemark Ti-Unite and ITI SLA implants
- Comparison of implant survival rate by sinus lifting technique in implantation with sinus lift
