1. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995. 21:173–176.
Article
2. Wu MK, Wasselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J. 2001. 34:137–141.
Article
3. Weiger R, ElAyouti A, Löst C. Efficacy of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. J Endod. 2002. 28:580–583.
4. Walton RE. Histologic evaluation of different methods of enlarging the pulp canal space. J Endod. 1976. 2:304–311.
Article
5. Siqueira JF Jr, Araujo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation technique for cleanig the apical third of root canals. J Endod. 1997. 23:499–502.
Article
6. Barbizam JV, Luis F. Effectiveness of manual and rotary instrumentation technique for cleaning flattened root canal. J Endod. 2002. 28:365–366.
7. Bechelli C, Colafranceschi M. Scanning electron microscope study the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Lightspeed instrument. Int Endod J. 1999. 32:484–493.
Article
8. Gutmann JL, Saunders WP, Nguyen L, Guo IY, Saunders EM. Ultrasonic root-end preparation Part 1 SEM analysis. Int Endod J. 1994. 27:318–324.
Article
9. Cohen S, Burns PC. Pathway of the pulp. 7th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby.
10. McComb D, Smith DC. A primary scanning electron microscope study of root canal after endodontic procedores. J Endod. 1975. 1:238–242.
Article
11. Walton R, Torabinejad M. Principle and practice of endodontics. 1996. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: 212–214.
12. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Glanz PO. The effect of EDTA-containing surface-active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin: an vivo study. J Dent Res. 1980. 59:1127–1131.
Article
13. Aktener BO, Cengiz T, Piskin B. The penetration of smear layer material into dentinal tubules during instrumentation with surface active reagents: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod. 1989. 15:588–590.
Article
14. Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of smeared layer on root canal walls. J Endod. 1984. 10:477–483.
Article
15. Williams S, Goldman M. Penetrability of the smeared layer by strain of proteus vulgaris. J Endod. 1985. 11:385–388.
16. Dippel H, Borggreven J, Happenbrouvers P. Morphology and permeability of the dentin smear layer. J Prosthet Dent. 1984. 52:657–662.
17. Akpata ES, Blechman H. Bacterial invasion of pulpar dentin wall in vitro. J Dent Res. 1982. 61:435–438.
18. Nissan R, Sehal H, Pashley DH, Trowbridge H. Ability of bacterial endotoxin to permeate human dentin. J Endod. 1995. 21:62–64.
19. Brännström M, Nyborg H. Bacterial growth and pulpal changes under inlays cemented with zinc phosphate and epoxylate CBA 9080. J Prosthet Dent. 1974. 31:556–565.
20. Gençoğlu N, Samni S, Gunday M. Evalutation of sealing properties of Thermafil and Ultrafil techniques in the abscence or presence of smear layer. J Endod. 1993. 19:599–603.
Article
21. Karagöz-Küçükay I, Bayirli G. An apical leakage study in the presence and abscence of smear layer. Int Endod J. 1994. 27:87–93.
22. Kennedy WA, Walker WA, Gough RW. Smear layer removal effect on apical leakage. J Endod. 1986. 12:21–27.
23. Cergneux M, Ciucchi B, Dietschi JM, Holz J. The influence of smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturation. Int Endod J. 1987. 20:228–232.
Article
24. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod. 1987. 13:147–157.
Article
25. Grossman LI, Melman B. Solution of pulp tissue by chemical agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 1941. 28:223.
Article
26. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 1996. 5th ed. St. Lous: Mosby.
27. Hülsmann M, Rummelin C, Schafers F. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpiece and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod. 1997. 23:301–306.
Article
28. Heard F, Walton RE. Scanning electron microscope study comparing four root canals preparation techniques in small curved canals. Int Endod J. 1997. 30:323–331.
Article
29. Bertrand MF, Pizzaardini P. The removal of the smear layer using the Quantec system. A study using the scanning electron microscope. Int Endod J. 1999. 32:217–224.
Article
30. Alaçam T. Scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of endodontic irrigating systems. Int Endod J. 1987. 20:287–294.
Article
31. Ciucchi B, Khettabi M, Holz J. The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 1989. 22:21–28.
Article
32. Peters OA, Barbakow F. Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: A scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2000. 26:6–10.
Article
33. Gambarini G, Laszkiewicz J. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2002. 35:422–427.
Article