Ann Surg Treat Res.  2014 Oct;87(4):185-191. 10.4174/astr.2014.87.4.185.

Caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea. liversurgeon@hanmail.net
  • 2Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Multiple segment 5 vein (V5) anastomoses are common and inevitable in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using modified right lobe (MRL) graft. Sacrifice of segment 4a vein (V4a) can simplify bench work and avoid graft congestion. But it could be harmful to some donors in previous simulation studies. This study aimed to evaluate donor safety in LDLT using caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe (CMPRL) graft.
METHODS
LDLT using MRL grafts were performed on 33 patients (group A) and LDLT using CMPRL grafts were performed on 37 patients (group B). Group B was classified into 2 subgroups by venous drainage pattern of segment 4: V4a dominant drainage group (group B1) and the other group (group B2). Parameters compared between group A donors and group B donors included operation time, bench work time, number and diameter of V5, remnant liver volume and postoperative course. Those were also investigated in group B1 compared with group B2. And, we reviewed postoperative course of the recipients in groups A and B.
RESULTS
Operation time and bench work time in group B were significantly shorter. There were no significant differences in most postoperative parameters between groups B1 and B2. As a result of recipient, V5 patency rates after LDLT were significantly higher in group B.
CONCLUSION
LDLT using CMPRL graft is a safe procedure for living donors. Donors with any type of V4 could be proper candidates for CMPRL graft if remnant liver volume is greater than 30% with minimal fatty change.

Keyword

Living donors; Liver transplantation; Hepatic vein trunk preservation; Hepatectomy

MeSH Terms

Drainage
Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)
Hepatectomy
Hepatic Veins*
Humans
Liver
Liver Transplantation*
Living Donors*
Tissue Donors
Transplants*
Veins
Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)

Figure

  • Fig. 1 After hepatic parenchyma dissection was performed, left side of caudal middle hepatic vein trunk and right side of cranial middle hepatic vein trunk were fully exposed. We transected middle hepatic vein tributary draining segment 4a vein (V4a) and get a single large orifice of middle hepatic vein tributary draining segment 5 vein (V5). Arrows indicate transection lines.

  • Fig. 2 In bench work, a single large orifice of caudal middle hepatic vein trunk (arrow) was anastomosed with a ringed Gore-Tex graft in end-to-end fashion and segment 8 vein (V8) was anastomosed in end-toside fashion.

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of serial postoperative AST (A), ALT (B), total bilirubin (C), and PT (D) between conventional modified right lobe group (group A) and caudal middle hepatic vein trunk preserved right lobe group (group B).

  • Fig. 4 Comparison of serial postoperative AST (A), ALT (B), total bilirubin (C), and PT (D) between V4a dominant drainage group (group B1) and the other group (group B2).


Reference

1. Chen CL, Fan ST, Lee SG, Makuuchi M, Tanaka K. Living-donor liver transplantation: 12 years of experience in Asia. Transplantation. 2003; 75:3 Suppl. S6–S11.
2. Maetani Y, Itoh K, Egawa H, Shibata T, Ametani F, Kubo T, et al. Factors influencing liver regeneration following living-donor liver transplantation of the right hepatic lobe. Transplantation. 2003; 75:97–102.
3. Lee S, Park K, Hwang S, Lee Y, Choi D, Kim K, et al. Congestion of right liver graft in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2001; 71:812–814.
4. Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H. Right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000; 69:258–264.
5. Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Sano K, Imamura H, Kaneko J, Ohkubo T, et al. Vein reconstruction in modified right liver graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2003; 237:180–185.
6. Lee SG, Park KM, Hwang S, Kim KH, Choi DN, Joo SH, et al. Modified right liver graft from a living donor to prevent congestion. Transplantation. 2002; 74:54–59.
7. Toshima T, Taketomi A, Ikegami T, Fukuhara T, Kayashima H, Yoshizumi T, et al. V5-drainage-preserved right lobe grafts improve graft congestion for living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2012; 93:929–935.
8. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Wei WI, Lo RJ, Lai CL, et al. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts. Ann Surg. 1997; 226:261–269.
9. Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL. Technical refinement in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft. Ann Surg. 2000; 231:126–131.
10. Lee S, Park K, Hwang S, Kim K, Ahn C, Moon D, et al. Anterior segment congestion of a right liver lobe graft in living-donor liver transplantation and strategy to prevent congestion. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003; 10:16–25.
11. Cho EH, Suh KS, Lee HW, Shin WY, Yi NJ, Lee KU. Safety of modified extended right hepatectomy in living liver donors. Transpl Int. 2007; 20:779–783.
12. Hwang S, Lee SG, Choi ST, Moon DB, Ha TY, Lee YJ, et al. Hepatic vein anatomy of the medial segment for living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe graft. Liver Transpl. 2005; 11:449–455.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr