Korean J Blood Transfus.  2001 Jun;12(1):27-34.

Performance evaluation of AmicusTM and MCS + during plateletpheresis

• Kwon SY
• Oh DJ
• Choi OI
• Han HS
• Cho NS
• Kim SI

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Recently introduced plateletpheresis systems (AmicusTM software version 2.41 and MCS + LDP Rev. C) were evaluated for their performance. METHOD: Single-needle procedure was used for all donors, 127 with the AmicusTM and 85 with the MCS +. The targeted platelet yield was 3.2x1011. Components were evaluated for component yields, collection time, collection efficiency and incidence of donor reactions due to citrate.
RESULTS
The collection time was significantly shorter with the AmicusTM (mean 57 min vs. 71 min, p< 0.05), and in 9 donors with a mean preapheresis platelet count of 325x103 /microliter the whole procedure could be completed within 40 minutes. However, the total processing time, including preprocessing and postprocessing time, between AmicusTM (78.0 min) and MCS + (74.3 min) was not statistically different. Mean platelet yield for AmicusTM and MCS + were 3.6x1011 and 3.4x1011, respectively. With 82.4% of SDPs collected with the MCS + having a platelet count of 3.0~3.9x1011, compared to 65.4% with the AmicusTM, the MCS + was more accurate in predicting the platelet yield of the final products. All components showed a residual WBC count of 5.0x106, and in 99.2% and 97.6% of components collected with the AmicusTM and MCS +, respectively, had a residual WBC count of less than 1.0x106. Mild donor reactions due to citrate tended to be more common on the MCS + (14.1%), which also used significantly more ACD (mean 342.5 mL vs. 268.0 mL, p< 0.05), than on the AmicusTM (5.5%).
CONCLUSION
The plateletpheresis systems evaluated in this study allow the collection of leukoreduced SDPs of high quality within a reasonable time.

Keyword

AmicusTM; MCS +; plateletpheresis

MeSH Terms

Blood Platelets
Citric Acid
Humans
Incidence
Platelet Count
Plateletpheresis*
Tissue Donors
Citric Acid