Korean J Urol.  2012 Oct;53(10):721-725. 10.4111/kju.2012.53.10.721.

Clinical Assessment of Follow-Up Cystatin C-Based eGFR in Live Kidney Donors

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hanwk@yuhs.ac

Abstract

PURPOSE
We aimed to compare the cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the serum creatinine-based eGFR and to investigate the clinical roles of the cystatin C-based eGFR in assessing the follow-up renal function of kidney donors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We enrolled 121 healthy kidney donors who underwent live donor nephrectomy between October 2009 and December 2010 in a prospective manner. Serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured preoperatively and were followed after the surgery (1st, 4th, and 7th postoperative day and 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th postoperative month). We also compared the sensitivity and specificity of each eGFR method for predicting the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after donor nephrectomy.
RESULTS
For those who had a Modification of Diet in Renal Disease postoperative day 4 eGFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, the probability of developing CKD was 89.0% (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR, 66.0%; Cockcroft-Gault eGFR, 74.0%; cystatin C eGFR, 57.1%). A cystatin C eGFR of below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at postoperative day 4 predicted CKD at 6 months with a specificity of 90.3%, which was the highest among the estimation methods used. Cystatin C eGFRs were generally higher than the creatinine-based eGFRs.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that cystatin C-based estimations of the GFR are helpful for predicting the recovery of renal function in kidney donors and could be added to the follow-up protocol of kidney donors who may develop CKD, especially patients whose immediate postoperative renal function is marginal.

Keyword

Kidney function tests; Kidney transplantation; Living donors; Nephrectomy

MeSH Terms

Cooperative Behavior
Creatinine
Cystatin C
Diet
Follow-Up Studies
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Kidney
Kidney Diseases
Kidney Function Tests
Kidney Transplantation
Living Donors
Nephrectomy
Prospective Studies
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tissue Donors
Creatinine
Cystatin C

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Scattered plot of eGFR value distribution: (A) preoperative, (B) 6 months postoperative. Cystatin C-based values were generally higher than the other creatinine-based values. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation; CKD-EPI, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation; GC, the Cockcroft-Gault equation.

  • FIG. 2 Receiver operating characteristic for CKD prediction by postoperative day 4 eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The area under the curve of the MDRD eGFR was the highest (0.845; 95% CI, 0.763 to 0.928); that of the cystatin C eGFR was the lowest (0.674; 95% confidence interval, 0.551 to 0.797). CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation; CKD-EPI, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation; GC, the Cockcroft-Gault equation.


Reference

1. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009. 360:459–469.
2. Lee JH, Kim SC, Han DJ, Chang JW, Yang WS, Park SK, et al. Risk factors for MDRD-GFR of less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in former kidney donors. Nephrology (Carlton). 2007. 12:600–606.
3. Jeon HG, Lee SR, Joo DJ, Oh YT, Kim MS, Kim YS, et al. Predictors of kidney volume change and delayed kidney function recovery after donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2010. 184:1057–1063.
4. Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Amin MG, Stark PC, MacLeod B, Griffith JL, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004. 15:1307–1315.
5. Mandelbrot DA, Pavlakis M, Karp SJ, Johnson SR, Hanto DW, Rodrigue JR. Practices and barriers in long-term living kidney donor follow-up: a survey of U.S. transplant centers. Transplantation. 2009. 88:855–860.
6. European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association. Section I. Measurement of renal function, when to refer and when to start dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002. 17:Suppl 7. 7–15.
7. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002. 39:2 Suppl 1. S1–S266.
8. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009. 150:604–612.
9. Westhuyzen J. Cystatin C: a promising marker and predictor of impaired renal function. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2006. 36:387–394.
10. Filler G, Bokenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martinez-Bru C, Grubb A. Cystatin C as a marker of GFR--history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem. 2005. 38:1–8.
11. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003. 139:137–147.
12. Herget-Rosenthal S, Pietruck F, Volbracht L, Philipp T, Kribben A. Serum cystatin C--a superior marker of rapidly reduced glomerular filtration after uninephrectomy in kidney donors compared to creatinine. Clin Nephrol. 2005. 64:41–46.
13. Gourishankar S, Courtney M, Jhangri GS, Cembrowski G, Pannu N. Serum cystatin C performs similarly to traditional markers of kidney function in the evaluation of donor kidney function prior to and following unilateral nephrectomy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008. 23:3004–3009.
14. Louvar DW, Rogers TB, Bailey RF, Matas AJ, Ibrahim HN. Cystatin C is not superior to creatinine-based models in estimating glomerular filtration rate in former kidney donors. Transplantation. 2007. 84:1112–1117.
15. White CA, Rule AD, Collier CP, Akbari A, Lieske JC, Lepage N, et al. The impact of interlaboratory differences in cystatin C assay measurement on glomerular filtration rate estimation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011. 6:2150–2156.
16. Grubb A, Blirup-Jensen S, Lindstrom V, Schmidt C, Althaus H, Zegers I, et al. First certified reference material for cystatin C in human serum ERM-DA471/IFCC. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010. 48:1619–1621.
17. Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C-based equation compared to serum creatinine-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Nephrol. 2008. 70:10–17.
18. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Bergert J, Larson TS. Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations. Kidney Int. 2006. 69:399–405.
19. Herget-Rosenthal S, Bokenkamp A, Hofmann W. How to estimate GFR-serum creatinine, serum cystatin C or equations? Clin Biochem. 2007. 40:153–161.
20. Lee BW, Ihm SH, Choi MG, Yoo HJ. The comparison of cystatin C and creatinine as an accurate serum marker in the prediction of type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007. 78:428–434.
21. Premaratne E, MacIsaac RJ, Finch S, Panagiotopoulos S, Ekinci E, Jerums G. Serial measurements of cystatin C are more accurate than creatinine-based methods in detecting declining renal function in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008. 31:971–973.
22. Herget-Rosenthal S, Marggraf G, Husing J, Goring F, Pietruck F, Janssen O, et al. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2004. 66:1115–1122.
23. Nejat M, Pickering JW, Walker RJ, Endre ZH. Rapid detection of acute kidney injury by plasma cystatin C in the intensive care unit. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010. 25:3283–3289.
24. Barri Y, Parker T 3rd, Kaplan B, Glassock R. Primum non Nocere: is chronic kidney disease staging appropriate in living kidney transplant donors? Am J Transplant. 2009. 9:657–660.
25. Tan JC, Ho B, Busque S, Blouch K, Derby G, Efron B, et al. Imprecision of creatinine-based GFR estimates in uninephric kidney donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. 5:497–502.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr