Korean J Anesthesiol.  2011 Dec;61(6):488-492. 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.6.488.

Comparison of ramosetron's and ondansetron's preventive anti-emetic effects in highly susceptible patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Deparment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea. anesthjin@hanmail.net

Abstract

BACKGROUND
This study compared the preventive effects of ramosetron and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in highly susceptible patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.
METHODS
In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, a total of 120 highly susceptible women (nonsmokers, those receiving opioid-based IV patient-controlled analgesia [PCA]) undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups and each group received either 0.3 mg of ramosetron or 4 mg of ondansetron, IV. All patients received fentanyl-based IV PCA during the 48 h postoperative periods. The incidences of PONV and side effects of 5-HT3 antagonists (headache and dizziness) were assessed at 3 intervals (<2 h, 2-24 h and 24-48 h) postoperatively.
RESULTS
Patients in the ramosetron group showed a significantly higher ratio of complete response and lower incidence of nausea during the 24-48 h interval after surgery compared with those the ondansetron group.
CONCLUSIONS
Ramosetron (0.3 mg) is more effective in preventing delayed PONV in highly susceptible women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy compared with ondansetron (4 mg).

Keyword

Abdominal hysterectomy; Ondansetron; PONV; Ramosetron

MeSH Terms

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Antiemetics
Benzimidazoles
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Incidence
Nausea
Ondansetron
Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Antiemetics
Benzimidazoles
Ondansetron
Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists

Cited by  3 articles

Comparison of prophylactic anti-emetic effects of ramosetron between single bolus administration and continuous infusion following bolus administration
A-ram Doo, Seong-Min Oh, Bong-Gon Kim, Seonghoon Ko
Anesth Pain Med. 2016;11(2):166-171.    doi: 10.17085/apm.2016.11.2.166.

Palonosetron has superior prophylactic antiemetic efficacy compared with ondansetron or ramosetron in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
Sung-Hoon Kim, Jeong-Yeon Hong, Won Oak Kim, Hae Keum Kil, Myong-Hwan Karm, Jai-Hyun Hwang
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64(6):517-523.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.6.517.

Comparison of the antiemetic effect of ramosetron with ondansetron in patients undergoing microvascular decompression with retromastoid craniotomy: a preliminary report
Sang Hee Ha, Hyunzu Kim, Hyang Mi Ju, Da Jung Nam, Kyeong Tae Min
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(4):386-391.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.4.386.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr