J Korean Surg Soc.  2011 Jul;81(1):50-53. 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.1.50.

One surgeon experiences in childhood inguinal hernias

• Karabulut

• KMID: 1853531
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.81.1.50

Abstract

PURPOSE
In this manuscript we report one pediatric surgeon's experience in childhood inguinal hernia repair.
METHODS
From 2005 to 2008, 402 children with inguinal hernias were operated on by one surgeon. A retrospective survey of their charts was carried out to evaluate the demographics and clinical aspects of these patients.
RESULTS
The ages ranged from 20 days to 16 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. 64.9% right, 27.1% left, and 7.9% bilateral hernias. Hydroceles were present in 6.2% assosiated hernias. Incarceration occurred in 8.7% of children. An opposite-side hernia developed in 5.7%. 5.3 percent of patients with a hernia repair on the right side later developed a hernia on the left side, and 8.2% of patients with a hernia repair on the left side later developed one on the right side. 4.5 percent of all male patients in this series and 8.6% of female patients developed an opposite-side hernia. While overall recurrence rate was 1.2%, our recurrence rate was 0.25%. There was a 0.24% wound infection rate, and 1 (0.24%) testicle was atrophic at follow-up.
CONCLUSION
In this study, in the recurrence of childhood hernia, the general surgeon's intervention was the prominent cause. It is suggested by the study that inguinal hernias on the contralateral side becomes symptomatic within the first six months following initial operation.Therefor, close observation is needed in that time.

Keyword

Pediatric inguinal hernia

MeSH Terms

Child
Demography
Female
Hernia
Hernia, Inguinal
Herniorrhaphy
Humans
Male
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Testis
Wound Infection

Reference

1. Bronsther B, Abrams MW, Elboim C. Inguinal hernias in children: a study of 1,000 cases and a review of the literature. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1972. 27:522–525.

2. Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A. Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2006. 41:980–986.

3. Shackelford RT, Bickham WS. Surgery of the alimentary tract. 1955. Philadelphia: Saunders;2280–2288.

4. Harper RG, Garcia A, Sia C. Inguinal hernia: a common problem of premature infants weighing 1,000 grams or less at birth. Pediatrics. 1975. 56:112–115.

5. Wolfson PJ. Mattei P, editor. Inguinal hernia. Surgical directives: pediatric surgery. 2003. Philadelphia: Lippincott;521–525.

6. Rowe MI, Clatworthy HW. Incarcerated and strangulated hernias in children. A statistical study of high-risk factors. Arch Surg. 1970. 101:136–139.

7. Park T, Jung E, Park WH, Choi SO. Clinical analysis of metachronous inguinal hernia in children. J Korean Surg Soc. 2011. 80:142–146.

8. Rowe MI, Copelson LW, Clatworthy HW. The patent processus vaginalis and the inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1969. 4:102–107.

9. Gray SW, Skandalakis JE. Embryology for surgeons: the embryological basis for the treatment of congenital defects. 1972. Philadelphia: Saunders;417–422.

10. Kalantari M, Shirgir S, Ahmadi J, Zanjani A, Soltani AE. Inguinal hernia and occurrence on the other side: a prospective analysis in Iran. Hernia. 2009. 13:41–43.

11. Lloyd DA, Rintala RJ. O'Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG, editors. Inguinal hernia and hydrocele. Pediatric surgery. 1998. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby;1071–1086.

12. Grosfeld JL, Minnick K, Shedd F, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Vane DW. Inguinal hernia in children: factors affecting recurrence in 62 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1991. 26:283–287.