J Korean Med Assoc.  2013 Aug;56(8):648-654. 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.8.648.

Civil liability for medical malpractice

• You H

• KMID: 1847866
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.8.648

Abstract

Medical disputes are rapidly increasing due to patients' rising awareness of their rights and greater access to medical information. Medical negligence means the breach of the duty of care based on the level of medical acts currently carried out in the field of clinical medicine at the time of performing the medical acts. To hold medical personnel liable for breach of the duty of care, the breach of the duty of care in medical acts, generation of damage, and the existence of causation between them should each be proven. The victim bears the burden of proving the elements. Considering the nature of medical acts such as the high degree of professionalism, doctor's discretion and incompleteness of medicine, judicial precedent has established a theory to ease the victim's burden of proof. When a doctor has corrected medical records after acci-dent, this is an act of obstructing verification. The court can use this fact against the obstructing party upon free evaluation of evidence. The liability for explanation is one of the doctor's most important duties. Moreover, doctors should prove that they fulfill the duty of explanation. This paper reviews the civil liability for medical malpractice. Due to the nature of a doctors' work, being charged with the lives, bodies, and health of patients, medical accidents may be inevi-table. Therefore, it is becoming more important for medical personnel to acquire ongoing medi-cal knowledge, keep medical records thoroughly, establish a good rapport with patients and faithfully perform the duty of explanation.

Keyword

Medical malpractice; Medical dispute; Burden of proof; Duty of explanation

MeSH Terms

Clinical Medicine
Dissent and Disputes
Human Rights
Humans
Malpractice
Medical Records
Ursidae

Reference

1. Choi JC, Park YH. Medical malpractice and medical dispute. Seoul: Yukbeopsa;2001.

2. Kim MJ. Medical law. Seoul: Sinronsa;2011.

3. Kim SS, Kim DY. Comprehensive analysis of medical cases and its outlook. Lawyers Assoc J. 1997; 484:5–32.

4. Lee SD. Medicine and criminal law. Seoul: Beommunsa;1998.

5. Park YH. The law of medical malpractice. Seoul: Legal Infor-mation Center;2005.

6. Son HS. Medical record revision and medical dispute. Supreme Court Law Rev. 2011; 53:1–112.