Anesth Pain Med.  2006 Jul;1(1):56-60.

Comparison of Remifentanil-Propofol and Remifentanil-Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Pediatric Tonsillectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. cjchung@dau.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared the hemodynamic response and recovery profile of remifentanil-sevoflurane anesthesia for a pediatric tonsillectomy with that of remifentanil-propofol anesthesia.
METHODS
Fifty healthy children (4-10 yr) undergoing a tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Anesthesia was induced with remifentanil 1 mcg/kg over 1 min, propofol 2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with remifentanil 0.25 mcg/kg/min and propofol 6 mg/kg/h, or remifentanil 0.25 mcg/kg/min and sevoflurane 1.0 vol%. The propofol and sevoflurane dose was kept unchanged, and remifentanil was titrated according to the hemodynamic response. The perioperative hemodynamics, recovery time, and side effects were assessed.
RESULTS
Remifentanil-based anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane resulted in stable hemodynamics, but sevoflurane was associated with a significantly lower systolic blood pressure. The recovery times were similar for spontaneous ventilation, extubation, eye opening, orientation, and full recovery in both groups. The incidence of side effects was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Remifentanil/sevoflurane is as equally effective as remifentanil/propofol in pediatric patients. The hemodynamic stability is appropriate and the recovery from anesthesia is rapid.

Keyword

pediatric anesthesia; remifentanil; tonsillectomy

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia*
Blood Pressure
Child
Hemodynamics
Humans
Incidence
Propofol
Tonsillectomy*
Ventilation
Propofol
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr