Ann Clin Microbiol.  2015 Mar;18(1):7-13. 10.5145/ACM.2015.18.1.7.

Evaluation of a Quantitative Sonication Method of Catheter Tip Culture for Diagnosis of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. mnkim@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) should demonstrate catheter colonization of the same organism as the isolate from peripheral blood cultures, by catheter tip culture or by differential time to positivity (DTP) of catheter-drawn blood cultures versus peripheral blood cultures. The purpose of this study was to compare the sonication and the roll-plate methods of catheter tip culture.
METHODS
One hundred and sixty-one catheter tips from 122 patients were submitted for catheter tip culture. Distal segments of the catheter were first inoculated using a roll-plate, and then inoculated by sonication. Sonication was performed using a BactoSonic device (Bandelin GmbH, Germany). A total of 1,018 sets of blood cultures from 7 days before to 1 day after catheter removal were analyzed for isolated organisms and DTP. Cutoffs of catheter colonization were > or =15 CFU for the roll-plate method, > or =100 CFU for sonication, and > or =2 h for DTP.
RESULTS
Twenty-four catheter tips (14.9%) showed colonization with at least one of the two methods: 21 (13.0%) with the roll-plate method and 22 (13.7%) with sonication. The positivity rates for the two methods showed no significant difference, and the concordance rate for the two methods was 96.9% (k=0.866, P<0.001). Blood culture was positive in 56 episodes in 44 patients, and 14 episodes of CRBSI were diagnosed in 12 patients: 10 by tip culture (two by sonication only) and 8 by DTP. Of the 122 specimens that were negative according to both methods, 4 were from the episodes of CRBSI diagnosed by DTP.
CONCLUSION
Roll-plate and sonication methods are comparable in diagnostic sensitivity for catheter colonization. The roll-plate and sonication catheter tip culture methods and DTP are complementary for diagnosis of CRBSI.

Keyword

Central venous catheter; Quantitative catheter tip culture; Semi-quantitative roll plate; Sonication

MeSH Terms

Catheters*
Central Venous Catheters
Colon
Diagnosis*
Humans
Sonication*

Reference

1.Slobbe L., El Barzouhi A., Boersma E., Rijnders BJ. Comparison of the roll plate method to the sonication method to diagnose catheter colonization and bacteremia in patients with long-term tunnelled catheters: a randomized prospective study. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. 47:885–8.
Article
2.O'Grady NP., Alexander M., Dellinger EP., Gerberding JL., Heard SO., Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002. 51:1–29.
3.Mermel LA., Allon M., Bouza E., Craven DE., Flynn P., O'Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and mana-gement of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. 49:1–45.
Article
4.Maki DG., Weise CE., Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med. 1977. 296:1305–9.
Article
5.Raad II., Sabbagh MF., Rand KH., Sherertz RJ. Quantitative tip culture methods and the diagnosis of central venous catheter- related infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992. 15:13–20.
6.Brun-Buisson C., Abrouk F., Legrand P., Huet Y., Larabi S., Rapin M. Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med. 1987. 147:873–7.
7.Collignon PJ., Soni N., Pearson IY., Woods WP., Munro R., Sorrell TC. Is semiquantitative culture of central vein catheter tips useful in the diagnosis of catheter-associated bacteremia? J Clin Microbiol. 1986. 24:532–5.
Article
8.Sitges-Serra A., Liñares J. Limitations of semiquantitative method for catheter culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1988. 26:1074–6.
Article
9.Sherertz RJ., Heard SO., Raad II. Diagnosis of triple-lumen catheter infection: comparison of roll plate, sonication, and flushing methodologies. J Clin Microbiol. 1997. 35:641–6.
Article
10.Bandelin electronic, BactoSonic. Sonication-method, principle and advantages. http://www.bactosonic.com/english/sonication/index.html/[Online. (last visited on 6 December 2014).
11.Erb S., Frei R., Schregenberger K., Dangel M., Nogarth D., Widmer AF. Sonication for diagnosis of catheter-related infection is not better than traditional roll-plate culture: a prospective cohort study with 975 central venous catheters. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. 59:541–4.
Article
12.Bouza E., Burillo A., Muñoz P. Catheter-related infections: diagnosis and intravascular treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002. 8:265–74.
Article
13.Maki DG., Goldman DA., Rhame FS. Infection control in intravenous therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1973. 79:867–87.
Article
14.Pawar M., Mehta Y., Kapoor P., Sharma J., Gupta A., Trehan N. Central venous catheter-related blood stream infections: incidence, risk factors, outcome, and associated pathogens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004. 18:304–8.
Article
15.Phillips I., Eykyn S., Curtis MA., Snell JJ. Pseudomonas cepacia (multivorans) septicaemia in an intensive-care unit. Lancet. 1971. 1:375–7.
16.Hekker TA., van Overhagen W., Schneider AJ. Pressure trans-ducers: an overlooked source of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 1990. 16:511–2.
Article
17.O'Grady NP., Alexander M., Burns LA., Dellinger EP., Garland J., Heard SO, et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011. 52:e162–93.
18.Steinberg JP., Robichaux C., Tejedor SC., Reyes MD., Jacob JT. Distribution of pathogens in central line-associated bloodstream infections among patients with and without neutropenia following chemotherapy: evidence for a proposed modification to the current surveillance definition. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013. 34:171–5.
Article
19.Chen WT., Liu TM., Wu SH., Tan TD., Tseng HC., Shih CC. Improving diagnosis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by using differential time to positivity as a hospital-wide approach at a cancer hospital. J Infect. 2009. 59:317–23.
Article
20.Oh SJ., Lee M. Differential time to positivity and semi- quantitative culture of catheter segments for diagnosing catheter- related bloodstream infections. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2012. 15:125–30.
Full Text Links
  • ACM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr