Hanyang Med Rev.  2015 May;35(2):72-77. 10.7599/hmr.2015.35.2.72.

Newborn Hearing Loss and Newborn Hearing Screening

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ashock@daum.net

Abstract

The incidence of bilateral profound hearing loss of newborns is 1 to 2 per 1,000 newborns. It is higher in infants with risk factors for hearing loss. Congenital hearing loss can cause many problems in language, learning, speech development and educational and occupational performance. Most developed countries have conducted the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) with automated otoacoustic emissions (AOAE) or automated auditory brainstem response (AABR). UNHS reduced the average age of identification of permanent hearing loss in infants 6 months or less after birth. This early identification and intervention of hearing loss with amplification and speech therapy optimizes communication during the early critical period of language acquisition and can improve language outcomes in children between 2 and 5 years of age. The aims of this paper are to explain the incidence of newborn hearing loss, the importance of early detection of hearing loss and intervention and newborn hearing screening methods.

Keyword

Hearing Loss; Infant, Newborn; Neonatal Screening; Transient Evoked otoacoustic Emissions; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem

MeSH Terms

Child
Critical Period (Psychology)
Developed Countries
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Hearing Loss*
Hearing*
Humans
Incidence
Infant
Infant, Newborn*
Learning
Mass Screening*
Neonatal Screening
Parturition
Risk Factors
Speech Therapy

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Well baby newborn hearing screening protocol of newborn nursery unit.

  • Fig. 2 Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) newborn hearing screening protocol.

  • Fig. 3 Newborn hearing screening protocol in the outpatient clinics.


Cited by  2 articles

Etiology and Rehabilitation of Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Seung Hwan Lee
Hanyang Med Rev. 2015;35(2):55-56.    doi: 10.7599/hmr.2015.35.2.55.

Sound Processor Replacement in Patients with Cochlear Implant: Analysis of a 30-Year Single-Institutional Experience
Myung Jin Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Jae Yeon Mun, Kyu-Yup Lee
Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2021;64(7):467-472.    doi: 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2020.00570.


Reference

1. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Helfand M. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA. 2001; 286:2000–2010.
2. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear. 2000; 21:508–528.
Article
3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120:898–921.
4. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998; 102:1161–1171.
Article
5. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Gravel JS. The evidence for universal newborn hearing screening. Am J Audiol. 2001; 10:62–64.
Article
6. Universal screening. US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2008; 122:143–148.
7. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P. Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. 2008; 122:e266–e276.
Article
8. Yoshinaga-Itano C. Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI). J Commun Disord. 2004; 37:451–465.
Article
9. Pimperton H, Kennedy CR. The impact of early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment on speech and language outcomes. Arch Dis Child. 2012; 97:648–653.
Article
10. The Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otologic Society. Korean Clinical Practice Guildline: newborn Hearing Screening 2010. Seoul: ML Communications;2011. p. 1–80.
11. Watkin PM. Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996; 75:F158–F168.
Article
12. Mason JA, Herrmann KR. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics. 1998; 101:221–228.
Article
13. Oh SH. Newborn hearing screening. The Korean Audiological Society. Practical manual of hearing tests. 1st ed. 2008. p. 247–268.
14. Finitzo T, Albright K, O'Neal J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery. Pediatrics. 1998; 102:1452–1460.
Article
15. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, et al. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics. 2005; 116:663–672.
Article
16. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: a multicenter investigation. Ear Hear. 2000; 21:348–356.
Article
17. White KR, Vohr BR, Meyer S, Widen JE, Johnson JL, Gravel JS, et al. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/auto mated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study. Am J Audiol. 2005; 14:S186–S199.
18. Widen JE, Johnson JL, White KR, Gravel JS, Vohr BR, James M, et al. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry. Am J Audiol. 2005; 14:S200–S216.
19. Gravel JS, White KR, Johnson JL, Widen JE, Vohr BR, James M, et al. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: recommendations for policy, practice, and research. Am J Audiol. 2005; 14:S217–S228.
20. UK Screening Portal [Internet]. UK: UK National Screening Committee. c2015. cited 2015 April 10. Available from: http://www.screening.nhs.uk/about/.
21. Fligor BJ, Neault MW, Mullen CH, Feldman HA, Jones DT. Factors associated with sensorineural hearing loss among survivors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. Pediatrics. 2005; 115:1519–1528.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HMR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr