J Korean Acad Periodontol.  2009 Mar;39(1):95-102. 10.5051/jkape.2009.39.1.95.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with anorganic bovine bone: Histologic evaluation in humans

• Son WK
• Shin SY
• Yang SM
• Kye SB

• KMID: 1783521
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2009.39.1.95

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to investigate the efficacy of anorganic bovine bone xenograft(Bio-Oss(R) ) at maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two male patients who missed maxillary posterior teeth were included. They were performed maxillary sinus floor augmentation using anorganic bovine bone xenograft(Bio-Oss(R) ). After 10 or 13 months, the regenerated tissues were harvested using trephine drills with 2 or 4mm diameter and non-decalcified specimens were made. The specimens were examined histologically and histomorphometrically to investigate graft resorption and new bone formation.
RESULTS
Newly formed bone was in contact with Bio-Oss(R) particles directly without any gap between the bone and the particles. The proportions of newly formed bone were 23.4~25.3% in patient 1(Pt.1) and 28.8% in patient 2(Pt.2). And the proportions of remained Bio-Oss(R) were 29.7~30.2% in Pt.1 and 29.2% in Pt.2. The fixtures installed at augmented area showed good stability and the augmented bone height was maintained well.
CONCLUSION
Anorganic bovine bone xenograft(Bio-Oss(R) ) has high osteoconductivity and helps new bone formation, so that it can be used in maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Keyword

sinus floor augmentation; anorganic bovine bone; Bio-Oss(R)

MeSH Terms

Humans
Male
Mandrillus
Maxillary Sinus
Osteogenesis
Sinus Floor Augmentation
Tooth
Transplants

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Preoperative panoramic view.

• 

  Figure 2 Intraoperative view of Right side.

• 

  Figure 3 Intraoperative view of Left side.

• 

  Figure 4 Postoperative panoramic view(10months).

• 

  Figure 5 Histologic view after 10months.

• 

  Figure 6 Preoperative panoramic view.

• 

  Figure 7 Intraoperative view.

• 

  Figure 8 Postoperative panoramic view(13months).

• 

  Figure 9 Histologic view after 13months.

Reference

1. Bays R. The pathophysiology and anatomy of edentulous bone loss. Reconstructive Preprosthetic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1986. 1:1–17.

2. Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernandez-Barbero JE, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007. 18:376–382.

3. Zinner ID, Small SA. Maxillary sinus grafts and prosthetic management. Implant Dentistry:From Failure to Success. 2004. 1st edition. Hong kong: Quintessence Books;99–100.

4. Kamada M, Shimazu K, Aoki H, et al. Maxillary sinusitis caused by oral implants. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologic. 2003. 96:231–236.

5. Galindo-Moreno P, Sanchez-Fernandez E, Avila G, et al. Migration of implants into the maxillary sinus: two clinical cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005. 20:291–295.

6. Van den Bergh JPA, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJM, et al. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2000. 11:256–265.

7. Jensen OT. The Sinus Bone Graft. 2006. 2nd edition. Quintessence Books;211–219.

8. Davies JE. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anatomical Record. 1996. 245:426–445.

9. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of Maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003. 8:328–343.

10. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, et al. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004. 24:565–577.

11. Daelemans P, Hermans M, Godet F, et al. Autologous bone graft to augment the maxillary sinus in conjunction with immediate endosseous implants: a retrospective study up to 5 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997. 17:27–39.

12. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002. 17:635–643.

13. Valentini P, Abensur DJ. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: A clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003. 18:556–560.

14. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, et al. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone(BioOss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: A histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999. 14:835–840.

15. Lee YM, Shin SY, Kim JY, et al. Bone reaction to bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: Histologic results in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006. 26:471–481.

16. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, et al. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral(BioOss) for implant placement: A 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000. 20:245–253.

17. Hammerle CHF, Chiantella GC, Karring T, et al. The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1998. 9:151–162.

18. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, et al. Histological evaluation of BioOss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1998. 9:59–64.

19. Scarano A, Pecora G, Piattelli M, et al. Osseointegration in a sinus augmented with bovine porous mineral: Histological results in an implant retrieved 4 years after insertion. A case report. J Periodontol. 2004. 75:1161–1166.