J Korean Med Sci.  2006 Apr;21(2):300-303. 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.2.300.

Clinical Efficacy of Body Mass Index as Predictor of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Outcomes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. seokhyun@plaza.snu.ac.kr
  • 2Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Population, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of body mass index (BMI) as a predictor of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcomes. Two hundred twenty-three IVF-ET cycles in 164 patients under 37 yr using GnRH agonist long protocols were included in this retrospective study. All of the selected cases were divided into two groups by a cutoff of 24 kg/m2 and these two groups were compared in regard to the outcomes of IVF-ET. There were no significant differences between group 1 (BMI <24 kg/m2) and group 2 (BMI > or = 24 kg/m2) in age, basal serum FSH level, estradiol (E2) level and endometrial thickness on hCG day, number of retrieved oocytes and transferred embryos. However, higher doses of gonadotropins were used in group 2 (30.8+/-12.7 ampoules vs. 35.4+/-15.3 ampoules, p=0.051). The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in group 2 (25.9% vs. 10.5%, p=0.041) and implantation rate tended to be lower in group 2 (12.7% vs. 6.8%, p=0.085). BMI > or = 24 kg/m2 can be a candidate prognosticator of IVF-ET outcomes.

Keyword

Body Mass Index; Fertilization; In Vitro; Embryo Transfer; Reproductive Techniques; Assited

MeSH Terms

Treatment Outcome
Prognosis
Pregnancy
Obesity/complications/pathology
Infertility, Female/complications/pathology/therapy
Humans
*Fertilization in Vitro
Female
*Embryo Transfer
Embryo Implantation
*Body Mass Index
Adult

Reference

1. Legato MJ. Gender-specific aspects of obesity. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1997. 42:184–197.
2. Manson JE, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Hankinson SE, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Body weight and mortality among women. N Engl J Med. 1995. 333:677–685.
Article
3. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999. 341:1097–1105.
4. Taucher S, Gnant M, Hausmaninger H. The prognostic influence of body mass index in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast. 2003. 12:S18.
Article
5. Isaacs JD, Magann EF, Martin RW, Chauhan SP, Morrison SC. Obstetric challenges of massive obesity complicating pregnancy. J Perinatol. 1994. 14:10–14.
Article
6. Green BB, Weiss NS, Daling JR. Risk of ovulatory infertility in relation to body weight. Fertil Steril. 1988. 50:721–726.
Article
7. Pasquali R, Casimirri F, Vicennati V. Weight control and its beneficial effect on fertility in women with obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1997. 12:82–87.
Article
8. Goswamy N, Feldman J, Grazi RV. Body mass index in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a comparison of treatment outcomes with clomiphene and gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2002. 78:S222.
Article
9. Nam YS, Jeong CJ, Kim NK, Yoon TK, Cha KY. Clinical consideration of obese infertile women. Korean J Fertil Steril. 2002. 29:209–214.
10. Loveland JB, McClamrock HD, Malinow AM, Sharara FI. Increased body mass index has a deleterious effect on in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001. 18:382–386.
11. Nichols JE, Crane MM, Higdon HL, Miller PB, Boone WR. Extremes of body mass index reduce in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2003. 79:645–647.
Article
12. Merryman DC, Yancey CA, Dalton KE, Houserman VL, Long CA, Honea KL. Regardless of oocyte source, body mass index is predictive of in vitro fertilization success. Fertil Steril. 2003. 80:S169.
Article
13. Lashen H, Ledger W, Bernal AL, Barlow D. Extremes of body mass do not adversely affect the outcome of superovulation and in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1999. 14:712–715.
Article
14. Lewis CG, Warnes GM, Wang X, Matthews CD. Failure of body mass index or body weight to influence markedly the response to ovarian hyperstimulation in normal cycling women. Fertil Steril. 1990. 53:1097–1099.
Article
15. Nichols JE Jr, Higdon HL 3rd, Crane MM 4th, Boone WR. Comparison of implantation and pregnancy rates in African American and white women in an assisted reproductive technology practice. Fertil Steril. 2001. 76:80–84.
Article
16. Kim SH, Ku SY, Jee BC, Suh CS, Moon SY, Lee JY. Clinical significance of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography of the ovarian artery as a predictor of ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002. 19:103–112.
17. Ku SY, Suh CS, Kim SH, Choi YM, Kim JG, Moon SY. A pilot study of the use of low dose human menopausal gonadotropin in ovulation induction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003. 109:55–59.
Article
18. Jee BC, Ku SY, Suh CS, Choi YM, Kim JG, Moon SY, Kim SH. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004. 30:372–376.
Article
19. Parihar M. Obesity and infertility. Rev Gynaecol Pract. 2003. 3:120–126.
Article
20. Hollmann M, Runnebaum B, Gerhard I. Impact of waist-hip-ratio and body-mass-index on hormonal and metabolic parameters in young, obese women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997. 21:476–483.
Article
21. Park YW, Kim CH, Shin HC. Is the cut-off value of body mass lndex (BMI) appropriate for identifying obesity in Korea? Korean J Health Promotion Dis Prev. 2002. 2:10–16.
22. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004. 363:157–163.
23. Patel JK, Hughes EA, Mackness MI, Vyas A, Cruickshank JK. Appropriate body-mass index for Asians. Lancet. 2003. 361:85.
Article
24. Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, Hertzmark E, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Wand H, Manson JE. Physical activity, body mass index, and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology. 2002. 13:184–190.
Article
25. Nichols JE, Miller PB, Boone WR, Crane MM. Effects of extremes of body mass index (BMI) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2001. 76:S74.
Article
26. Wattanakumtornkul S, Damario MA, Stevens Hall SA, Thornhill AR, Tummon IS. Body mass index and uterine receptivity in the oocyte donation model. Fertil Steril. 2003. 80:336–340.
Article
27. Wang JX, Davies M, Norman RJ. Body mass index and probability of pregnancy during assisted reproduction treatment: retrospective study. BMJ. 2000. 321:1320–1321.
28. Fedorcsak P, Dale PO, Storeng R, Ertzeid G, Bjercke S, Oldereid N, Omland AK, Abyholm T, Tanbo T. Impact of overweight and underweight on assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod. 2004. 19:2523–2528.
29. Pasquali R, Pelusi C, Genghini S, Cacciari M, Gambineri A. Obesity and reproductive disorder in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2003. 9:359–372.
30. Carrell DT, Jones KP, Peterson CM, Aoki V, Emery BR, Campbell BR. Body mass index is inversely related to intrafollicular HCG concentrations, embryo quality and IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2001. 3:109–111.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr