Korean J Lab Med.  2010 Dec;30(6):533-539. 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.533.

Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Leukemia Patients by Flow Cytometric Assay of Cross-lineage Antigen Expression

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. cjpark@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
It has been demonstrated that flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has a prognostic significance in the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. We investigated the significance of flow cytometric MRD detection for the first time in Korea.
METHODS
We analyzed the results of MRD detection in morphologically complete remission bone marrow aspirates from 89 patients with newly-diagnosed or relapsed acute leukemia, in which leukemic cells had cross-lineage antigen expression. Patients were grouped based on MRD frequencies: > or =1.0%, high MRD; <1.0%, low MRD.
RESULTS
Forty-seven ALL patients consisted of 10 with high and 37 with low MRD levels. Patients with high MRD levels showed a tendency of more frequent relapse than those with low MRD levels (40.0% and 13.5%, respectively) (P=0.08). High MRD group showed a tendency of short relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), although the differences were not statistically significant. Forty-two AML patients consisted of 16 with high and 26 with low MRD levels. There were no correlations between the MRD levels and relapse rate, RFS or OS. AML patients with high MRD levels showed significantly higher rate of unfavorable cytogenetic risk categories and lower rate of favorable risk categories (P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
MRD detection by flow cytometric assay of cross-lineage antigen expression would be useful in predicting treatment outcome in patients with ALL rather than AML. We expect that the establishment of the standardization of methods, time to test or antibody combination would be achieved through further trials in this country.

Keyword

Minimal residual disease; Acute leukemia; Flow cytometric assay; Cross-lineage antigen expression

MeSH Terms

Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antigens/*metabolism
Antigens, CD/metabolism
Bone Marrow/metabolism
Child
Child, Preschool
Disease-Free Survival
Female
*Flow Cytometry
Humans
Infant
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/*diagnosis/mortality/therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/*diagnosis/mortality/therapy
Recurrence
Survival Rate

Figure

  • Fig. 1. MRD detection in the bone marrow aspirates from an ALL patient at diagnosis (A), and patients with morphological remission (B and C). The leukemia-associated phenotype includes CD13 and CD19 expression. The MRD levels were 4.33% (B) and 0.01% (C). Abbreviations: PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocynate; MRD, minimal residual disease.

  • Fig. 2. Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) frequency in bone marrow aspirates after morphological remission in ALL patients. (A) High MRD group showed a tendency of shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) than low MRD group using a cutoff level of 1.0% (P=0.11). (B) High MRD group also showed a tendency of shorter overall survival (OS) than low MRD group (P=0.54).


Reference

1.Vidriales MB., San-Miguel JF., Orfao A., Coustan-Smith E., Campana D. Minimal residual disease monitoring by flow cytometry. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2003. 16:599–612.
Article
2.Chung NG., Buxhofer-Ausch V., Radich JP. The detection and significance of minimal residual disease in acute and chronic leukemia. Tissue Antigens. 2006. 68:371–85.
Article
3.Kern W., Haferlach C., Haferlach T., Schnittger S. Monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2008. 112:4–16.
Article
4.Campana D. Status of minimal residual disease testing in childhood haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol. 2008. 143:481–9.
Article
5.Al-Mawali A., Gillis D., Lewis I. The role of multiparameter flow cytometry for detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009. 131:16–26.
Article
6.Ciudad J., San Miguel JF., Lopez-Berges MC., Vidriales B., Valverde B., Ocqueteau M, et al. Prognostic value of immunophenotypic detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1998. 16:3774–81.
Article
7.Coustan-Smith E., Sancho J., Hancock ML., Boyett JM., Behm FG., Raimondi SC, et al. Clinical importance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2000. 96:2691–6.
Article
8.Coustan-Smith E., Sancho J., Behm FG., Hancock ML., Razzouk BI., Ribeiro RC, et al. Prognostic importance of measuring early clearance of leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002. 100:52–8.
Article
9.Dworzak MN., Froschl G., Printz D., Mann G., Potschger U., Muhlegger N, et al. Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002. 99:1952–8.
Article
10.Coustan-Smith E., Gajjar A., Hijiya N., Razzouk BI., Ribeiro RC., Rivera GK, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia after first relapse. Leukemia. 2004. 18:499–504.
Article
11.Coustan-Smith E., Ribeiro RC., Stow P., Zhou Y., Pui CH., Rivera GK, et al. A simplified flow cytometric assay identifies children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who have a superior clinical outcome. Blood. 2006. 108:97–102.
Article
12.Borowitz MJ., Devidas M., Hunger SP., Bowman WP., Carroll AJ., Carroll WL, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study. Blood. 2008. 111:5477–85.
Article
13.San Miguel JF., Martinez A., Macedo A., Vidriales MB., Lopez-Berges C., Gonzalez M, et al. Immunophenotyping investigation of minimal residual disease is a useful approach for predicting relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood. 1997. 90:2465–70.
Article
14.Venditti A., Buccisano F., Del Poeta G., Maurillo L., Tamburini A., Cox C, et al. Level of minimal residual disease after consolidation therapy predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2000. 96:3948–52.
Article
15.Plata E., Choremi-Papadopoulou H., Viglis V., Yataganas X. Flow-cytometric detection of minimal residual disease with atypical antigen combinations in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2000. 79:543–6.
Article
16.San Miguel JF., Vidriales MB., Lopez-Berges C., Diaz-Mediavilla J., Gutierrez N., Canizo C, et al. Early immunophenotypical evaluation of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia identifies different patient risk groups and may contribute to postinduction treatment stratification. Blood. 2001. 98:1746–51.
Article
17.Venditti A., Tamburini A., Buccisano F., Del Poeta G., Maurillo L., Panetta P, et al. Clinical relevance of minimal residual disease detection in adult acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2002. 11:349–57.
Article
18.Coustan-Smith E., Ribeiro RC., Rubnitz JE., Razzouk BI., Pui CH., Pounds S, et al. Clinical significance of residual disease during treatment in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2003. 123:243–52.
Article
19.Kern W., Voskova D., Schoch C., Hiddemann W., Schnittger S., Haferlach T. Determination of relapse risk based on assessment of minimal residual disease during complete remission by multiparameter flow cytometry in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2004. 104:3078–85.
Article
20.Kern W., Voskova D., Schoch C., Schnittger S., Hiddemann W., Haferlach T. Prognostic impact of early response to induction therapy as assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2004. 89:528–40.
21.Feller N., van der Pol MA., van Stijn A., Weijers GW., Westra AH., Evertse BW, et al. MRD parameters using immunophenotypic detection methods are highly reliable in predicting survival in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2004. 18:1380–90.
Article
22.Buccisano F., Maurillo L., Gattei V., Del Poeta G., Del Principe MI., Cox MC, et al. The kinetics of reduction of minimal residual disease impacts on duration of response and survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2006. 20:1783–9.
Article
23.Shin S., Kahng J., Kim M., Lim J., Kim Y., Han K. Distribution of antigenic aberration in the bone marrow of acute leukemia in complete remission. Korean J Lab Med. 2008. 28:1–7. (신소영, 강지민, 김명신, 임지향, 김용구, 한경자. 급성백혈병 완전 관해 골수에서 항원형 이상 세포의분포. 대한진단검사의학회지 2008;28:1-7.).
Article
24.Kern W., Danhauser-Riedl S., Ratei R., Schnittger S., Schoch C., Kolb HJ, et al. Detection of minimal residual disease in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia using multiparameter flow cytometry for definition of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and determination of their frequencies in normal bone marrow. Haematologica. 2003. 88:646–53.
25.Mrozek K., Heerema NA., Bloomfield CD. Cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Blood Rev. 2004. 18:115–36.
Full Text Links
  • KJLM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr