Yonsei Med J.  2014 Jan;55(1):247-253. 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.1.247.

Diagnostic Role of Conventional Ultrasonography and Shearwave Elastography in Asymptomatic Patients with Diffuse Thyroid Disease: Initial Experience with 57 Patients

• Kim I
• Kim EK
• Yoon JH
• Han KH
• Son EJ
• Moon HJ
• Kwak JY

• KMID: 1779913
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.1.247

Abstract

PURPOSE
Thyroid ultrasonography (US) is a useful diagnostic tool in the evaluation of diffuse thyroid disease (DTD), whereas shearwave elastography is a dynamic technique that can provide information about tissue hardness by using acoustic shearwaves remotely induced by a focused ultrasonic beam. This study aims at investigating the role of conventional US and shearwave elastography in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients with DTD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty-seven patients who underwent both conventional US and shearwave elastography were included in this study. Interobserver variability of the three radiologists in assessment of underlying thyroid echogenicity on conventional US was analyzed. Diagnostic performances for diagnosing DTD on conventional US and shearwave elastography were calculated and compared.
RESULTS
Fair agreement was observed in the identification of DTD with conventional US (kappa value=0.27). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were 0.52-0.585 on conventional US by three radiologists. The Az values when using the mean and maximum elasticity values as a diagnostic criteria for DTD were 0.619 and 0.59 on shearwave elastography. Patients with DTD showed higher mean [24.1+/-10 kilo-Pascals (kPa)] and maximum (36.4+/-13.3 kPa) elasticity values on shearwave elastography when compared to the normal group (23.4+/-10.8 kPa and 33.7+/-12.4 kPa, respectively), although without statistical significance (p=0.802 and p=0.452, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Conventional US did not show reliable interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of DTD. Although not statistically significant, shearwave elastography may provide additional information in the diagnosis of DTD. Therefore, larger prospective studies are needed to define the values of shearwave elastography for diagnosing DTD.

Keyword

Ultrasonography; shearwave elastography; thyroid gland; diffuse thyroid disease

MeSH Terms

Adult
Elasticity Imaging Techniques/*methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Thyroid Diseases/*ultrasonography
Thyroid Gland/*ultrasonography
Ultrasonography/*methods

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Conventional ultrasound and shearwave elastography images from a 61-year-old woman with normal thyroid function. (A and B) Transverse and longitudinal ultrasound images show normal homogeneous thyroid parenchymal echogenicity. (C) A shearwave elastography image of underlying thyroid parenchyma shows mean and maximum elasticity values of 16.2 kPa and 25.8 kPa.

• 

  Fig. 2 Conventional ultrasound and shearwave elastography images from a 29-year-old woman with Hashimoto thyroiditis. (A and B) Transverse and longitudinal ultrasound images show heterogeneous and hypoechoic underlying thyroid parenchyma. (C) A shearwave elastography image shows mean and maximum elasticity of 15.8 kPa and 31.6 kPa.

• 

  Fig. 3 Box plots show elasticity values of normal and diffuse thyroid disease group. The central line of each box indicates the median and the asterisk (*) indicates the mean elasticity value of each group, respectively. In the box plots of mean elasticity values (A) and maximum elasticity values (B), mean values of both mean and maximum elasticity were higher in patients with diffuse thyroid disease than those in the normal group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p=0.802 and p=0.452). DTD, diffuse thyroid disease; Mean, mean elasticity value; Maximum, maximum elasticity value.

Reference

1. Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Kim DI, Lee JT, et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178:687–691.

2. Kim SJ, Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Yoo HS. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: is it useful in infracentimetric nodules? Yonsei Med J. 2003; 44:635–640.

3. Moon WJ, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim DW, Kim EK, Kim JY, et al. Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12:1–14.

4. Pedersen OM, Aardal NP, Larssen TB, Varhaug JE, Myking O, Vik-Mo H. The value of ultrasonography in predicting autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid. 2000; 10:251–259.

5. Shin DY, Kim EK, Lee EJ. Role of ultrasonography in outcome prediction in subclinical hypothyroid patients treated with levothyroxine. Endocr J. 2010; 57:15–22.

6. Yeh HC, Futterweit W, Gilbert P. Micronodulation: ultrasonographic sign of Hashimoto thyroiditis. J Ultrasound Med. 1996; 15:813–819.

7. Kim DW, Eun CK, In HS, Kim MH, Jung SJ, Bae SK. Sonographic differentiation of asymptomatic diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroid: a prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31:1956–1960.

8. Sohn YM, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY. Mixed echoic thyroid nodules on ultrasound: approach to management. Yonsei Med J. 2012; 53:812–819.

9. Lee MJ, Hong SW, Chung WY, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Kim EK. Cytological results of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for thyroid nodules: emphasis on correlation with sonographic findings. Yonsei Med J. 2011; 52:838–844.

10. Marcocci C, Vitti P, Cetani F, Catalano F, Concetti R, Pinchera A. Thyroid ultrasonography helps to identify patients with diffuse lymphocytic thyroiditis who are prone to develop hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991; 72:209–213.

11. Hayashi N, Tamaki N, Konishi J, Yonekura Y, Senda M, Kasagi K, et al. Sonography of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1986; 14:123–126.

12. Nys P, Cordray JP, Merceron RE, et al. Etiologic discussion and clinical relevance of thyroid ultrasonography in subclinical hypothyroidism. A retrospective study in 1845 patients. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2009; 70:59–63.

13. Rosário PW, Bessa B, Valadão MM, Purisch S. Natural history of mild subclinical hypothyroidism: prognostic value of ultrasound. Thyroid. 2009; 19:9–12.

14. Asteria C, Giovanardi A, Pizzocaro A, Cozzaglio L, Morabito A, Somalvico F, et al. US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2008; 18:523–531.

15. Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, Pinchera A, Vitti P. Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92:2917–2922.

16. Sebag F, Vaillant-Lombard J, Berbis J, Griset V, Henry JF, Petit P, et al. Shear wave elastography: a new ultrasound imaging mode for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95:5281–5288.

17. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T, et al. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1999; 213:203–233.

18. Choi JS, Chung WY, Kwak JY, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim EK. Staging of papillary thyroid carcinoma with ultrasonography: performance in a large series. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18:3572–3578.

19. Tessler FN, Tublin ME. Thyroid sonography: current applications and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173:437–443.

20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33:159–174.

21. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950; 3:32–35.

22. Kim SH, Park CS, Jung SL, Kang BJ, Kim JY, Choi JJ, et al. Observer variability and the performance between faculties and residents: US criteria for benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Korean J Radiol. 2010; 11:149–155.

23. Park CS, Kim SH, Jung SL, Kang BJ, Kim JY, Choi JJ, et al. Observer variability in the sonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010; 38:287–293.

24. Choi SH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Son EJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variations in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2010; 20:167–172.

25. Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Kwak JY. Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193:W416–W423.

26. Sporea I, Vlad M, Bota S, Sirli RL, Popescu A, Danila M, et al. Thyroid stiffness assessment by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI). Ultraschall Med. 2011; 32:281–285.

27. LiVolsi VA. The pathology of autoimmune thyroid disease: a review. Thyroid. 1994; 4:333–339.

28. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Mai JJ, et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology. 2005; 237:202–211.

29. Sarvazyan AP, Rudenko OV, Swanson SD, Fowlkes JB, Emelianov SY. Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998; 24:1419–1435.

30. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Montaldo G, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008; 34:1373–1386.

31. Sporea I, Sirli R, Bota S, Popescu A, Sendroiu M, Jurchis A. Comparative study concerning the value of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI) in comparison with transient elastography (TE) for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012; 38:1310–1316.