1. Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications. Eur Radiol. 2002. 12:2188–2191.
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005. 353:1773–1783.
3. Chan HP, Helvie MA, Petrick N, Sahiner B, Adler DD, Paramagul C, et al. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications. Acad Radiol. 2001. 8:454–466.
4. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screenfilm mammography. Eur Radiol. 2002. 12:2679–2683.
5. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations. Radiology. 2001. 218:873–880.
6. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D/, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E. Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002. 12:1697–1702.
7. Funke M, Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Fischer U, Grabbe E. Soft copy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography. Radiologe. 2002. 42:265–269.
8. Kim HS, Han BK, Choo K, Jeon YH, Choe YH. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications. KJR Korean J Radiol. 2005. 6:214–220.
9. Kuzmiak CM, Millnamow GA, Qaqish B, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Brown ME. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens. Acad Radiol. 2002. 9:1378–1382.
10. Johnson CD. Hard-versus soft-copy interpretation. Radiology. 2003. 227:629–630.