Korean Circ J.  2011 Dec;41(12):703-704. 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.12.703.

Staged Complete Revascularization in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Should Be the Treatment of Choice Compared to Primary Complete Revascularization

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea. dslmd@kumc.or.kr

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Myocardial Infarction

Reference

1. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention). Circulation. 2006. 113:156–175.
2. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention). Circulation. 2006. 113:e166–e286.
3. Varani E, Balducelli M, Aquilina M, et al. Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. 72:927–933.
4. Jo HS, Park JS, Sohn JW, et al. Culprit-lesion-only versus multivessel revascularization using drug-Eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-Based Analysis. Korean Circ J. 2011. 41:718–725.
5. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. 58:704–711.
6. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, et al. Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. 3:22–31.
7. Vlaar PJ, Mahmoud KD, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. 58:692–703.
8. Brener SJ, Murphy SA, Gibson CM, DiBattiste PM, Demopoulos LA, Cannon CP. Efficacy and safety of multivessel percutaneous revascularization and tirofiban therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2002. 90:631–633.
9. Shishehbor MH, Lauer MS, Singh IM, et al. In unstable angina or non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome, should patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergo multivessel or culprit-only stenting? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. 49:849–854.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr