Clin Orthop Surg.  2014 Mar;6(1):56-61. 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.56.

Influence of Insurance Benefit Criteria on the Administration Rate of Osteoporosis Drugs in Postmenopausal Females

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. spinelee@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Medical Department, GlaxoSmithKline Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Preventive measures need to be implemented to lower the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporotic fractures increase morbidity and mortality as well as impose a socioeconomic burden; however, current research is limited to the administration rates of osteoporosis drugs for Korean postmenopausal females.
METHODS
This study represents a nationwide, observational, and cross-sectional survey that investigates the administration rates of osteoporosis drugs based upon a bone mineral density (BMD) test performed on Korean postmenopausal patients who visited outpatient orthopedic clinics. BMD test results were examined in postmenopausal female patients (50 to 80 years of age); subsequently, the patients were classified into an osteoporosis group, osteopenia group, and normal group. The administration rates of osteoporosis drugs and bisphosphonates were then analyzed. The osteoporosis group was subdivided into a T-score less than -3.0 group and a T-score between -3.0 and -2.5 group that were separately analyzed.
RESULTS
Based on the lumbar spine BMD, the rate of administration of osteoporosis drugs in the osteoporosis group was 42.1%, which was significantly higher compared to the osteopenia group or normal group. A significantly low bone mineral density was observed in patients who were administered bisphosphonates. Based on the lumbar spine BMD, the administration rate of osteoporosis drugs in the group with a T-score between -3.0 and -2.5 (34.2%) was significantly lower than the group with a T-score less that -3.0 (46.2%). The bisphosphonate administration rate was also significantly low; however, the administration rate for osteoporosis drugs was significantly lower than that of the osteopenia group.
CONCLUSIONS
Only about 40% of Korean postmenopausal female patients with osteoporosis were administered osteoporosis drugs. The administration rate in patients with a T-score between -3.0 and -2.5 was particularly low and active treatment to prevent osteoporotic fractures is required in this group.

Keyword

Postmenopausal osteoporosis; Korean; Osteoporosis medication; Bisphophonate; National Health Insurance Service

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density Conservation Agents/*therapeutic use
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Prescriptions/*statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Insurance Benefits/*methods
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis/*drug therapy/epidemiology
Republic of Korea
Bone Density Conservation Agents

Cited by  2 articles

Factors Affecting Bone Mineral Density Measurement after Fracture in South Korea
Jin-Woo Kim, Yong-Chan Ha, Young-Kyun Lee
J Bone Metab. 2017;24(4):217-222.    doi: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.4.217.

Comparison of scaling rate data of Community Health Survey and National Health Insurance Service
Young-Eun Jang, Kang-Ju Son, Chun-Bae Kim, Nam-Hee Kim
J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2019;43(1):26-32.    doi: 10.11149/jkaoh.2019.43.1.26.


Reference

1. van der Klift M, de Laet CD, Pols HA. Assessment of fracture risk: who should be treated for osteoporosis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005; 19(6):937–950. PMID: 16301188.
Article
2. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet. 1999; 353(9156):878–882. PMID: 10093980.
Article
3. Gold DT. The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone. 1996; 18(3 Suppl):185S–189S. PMID: 8777086.
Article
4. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001; 285(3):320–323. PMID: 11176842.
Article
5. Wustrack R, Seeman E, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Burch S, Palermo L, Black DM. Predictors of new and severe vertebral fractures: results from the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23(1):53–58. PMID: 21691843.
Article
6. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159(11):1215–1220. PMID: 10371229.
7. Lau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A. Mortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in the Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(7):1479–1486. PMID: 18594096.
Article
8. Stavrou ZP, Erginousakis DA, Loizides AA, Tzevelekos SA, Papagiannakos KJ. Mortality and rehabilitation following hip fracture: a study of 202 elderly patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1997; 275:89–91. PMID: 9385276.
9. Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE. The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(3):398–403. PMID: 9096540.
Article
10. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15(1):38–42. PMID: 14593451.
Article
11. Lau EM. Osteoporosis: a worldwide problem and the implications in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002; 31(1):67–68. PMID: 11885498.
12. Dhanwal DK, Cooper C, Dennison EM. Geographic variation in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence: the growing importance of asian influences in coming decades. J Osteoporos. 2010; 2010:757102. PMID: 20981334.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr