Korean J Gastroenterol.  2012 Jul;60(1):42-46. 10.4166/kjg.2012.60.1.42.

A Case of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Portal Hypertension

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jwchulkr@yahoo.co.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Portal vein thrombus has been detected in patients with liver cirrhosis, pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis, septicemia, myeloproliferative disorder, and neoplasm. The formation of portal tumor thrombus by hepatocellular carcinoma is well recognized, because of its high incidence, and subsequent development of portal hypertension such as rupture of varices, ascites and liver failure indicates the poor prognosis. In gastric cancer, portal hypertension as an initial presentation is extremely rare. Herein we report a case presenting as portal hypertension caused by tumor thrombus without invasion of liver parenchyma. It is presumed to be intraluminal tumor thrombus originating from primary foci of gastric adenocarcinoma. Tumor thrombus in the portal vein is demonstrated on the PET-CT.

Keyword

Gastric cancer; Portal hypertension; Thrombus

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/radionuclide imaging
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/diagnostic use
Humans
Hypertension, Portal/*diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography
Stomach Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/radionuclide imaging

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Abdominal CT findings. (A) Axial CT image revealed that heterogeneously enhanced thrombosis with cavernous transformation in the main portal vein was observed in portal phase. (B) There was a large amount of ascites with extensive portal vein thrombosis in coronal CT image.

  • Fig. 2 Endoscopic findings. It showed an ulcero-infiltrative mass involving (A) the cardia, (B) antrum and (C) duodenal bulb.

  • Fig. 3 Microscopic findings. (A) It revealed invasive glandular structures, nests, and irregular arrays of hyperchromatic round cells (H&E, ×100). (B) Tumor consists of large pleomorphic cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and mitotic figures (H&E, ×400).

  • Fig. 4 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT findings. (A) PET and (B) PET/CT images showed an irregular wall thickening with increased FDG uptake (mean standard uptake value of 7.0) at the gastric body. Extensive portal vein thrombosis with increased FDG uptake at the main and intrahepatic portal vein regions suggested tumor thrombus.

  • Fig. 5 Abdominal CT at 6 weeks after initial diagnosis. (A) Axial and (B) coronal CT images showed marked shrinkage of the liver, increased amount of ascites and the progression of tumor thrombosis in the portal vein.


Reference

1. Ishikawa M, Koyama S, Ikegami T, et al. Venous tumor thrombosis and cavernous transformation of the portal vein in a patient with gastric carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 1995. 30:529–533.
2. Tanaka A, Takeda R, Mukaihara S, et al. Tumor thrombi in the portal vein system originating from gastrointestinal tract cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2002. 37:220–228.
3. Ghosh P, Miyai K, Chojkier M. Gastric adenocarcinoma inducing portal hypertension: a rare presentation. World J Gastroenterol. 2007. 13:960–963.
4. Lee TH. Recent advances in diagnosis of portal hypertension. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010. 56:135–143.
5. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, et al. Portal Hypertension Collaborative Group. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005. 353:2254–2261.
6. Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Portal Hypertension Collaborative Group. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2007. 133:481–488.
7. Hoefs JC. Serum protein concentration and portal pressure determine the ascitic fluid protein concentration in patients with chronic liver disease. J Lab Clin Med. 1983. 102:260–273.
8. Poonawala A, Nair SP, Thuluvath PJ. Prevalence of obesity and diabetes in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis: a case-control study. Hepatology. 2000. 32:689–692.
9. Kim YS. Ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with portal hypertension. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010. 56:168–185.
10. Cohen J, Edelman RR, Chopra S. Portal vein thrombosis: a review. Am J Med. 1992. 92:173–182.
11. Valla DC, Condat B. Portal vein thrombosis in adults: pathophysiology, pathogenesis and management. J Hepatol. 2000. 32:865–871.
12. Henderson JM, Gilmore GT, Mackay GJ, Galloway JR, Dodson TF, Kutner MH. Hemodynamics during liver transplantation: the interactions between cardiac output and portal venous and hepatic arterial flows. Hepatology. 1992. 16:715–718.
13. Ohnishi K, Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, et al. Formation of hilar collaterals or cavernous transformation after portal vein obstruction by hepatocellular carcinoma. Observations in ten patients. Gastroenterology. 1984. 87:1150–1153.
14. Ogren M, Bergqvist D, Björck M, Acosta S, Eriksson H, Sternby NH. Portal vein thrombosis: prevalence, patient characteristics and lifetime risk: a population study based on 23,796 consecutive autopsies. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. 12:2115–2119.
15. Araki T, Suda K, Sekikawa T, Ishii Y, Hihara T, Kachi K. Portal venous tumor thrombosis associated with gastric adenocarcinoma. Radiology. 1990. 174:811–814.
16. Liu X, Cheng Y, Sheng W, et al. Analysis of clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010. 34:1465–1471.
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr