Korean J Gastroenterol.  2010 Nov;56(5):334-335. 10.4166/kjg.2010.56.5.334.

Is Streoscopic Finding Valuable for the Pathologic Diagnosis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Specimen?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kkmkys@skku.edu

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Adenoma/pathology
Dissection/*methods
Gastric Mucosa/*pathology/surgery
Gastroscopy/*methods
Humans
Stomach Neoplasms/pathology/surgery

Reference

1. Lauwers GY, Ban S, Mino M, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: a study of 39 cases with emphasis on the evaluation of specimens and recommendations for optimal pathologic analysis. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17:2–8.
Article
2. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Nishi M, Omori Y, Miwa K, editors. eds.Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 1st ed.Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd;1995.
3. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001; 48:225–229.
Article
4. Cho YK, Cho JY, Jin SY, et al. Comparison of the cut direction between gross finding, streoscopic finding, and pathologic mapping of post endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010; 56:293–298.
5. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994; 47:880–885.
Article
6. Ryozawa S, Watanabe H, Abe M, Ajioka Y, Nishikura K, Okita K. Macroscopic and stereomicroscopic diagnosis of superficial flat-type early carcinomas of the gallbladder. J Gastroenterol. 1997; 32:635–642.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr