Yonsei Med J.  2012 Jul;53(4):729-733. 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.4.729.

Differential Diagnosis of Complex Renal Cysts Based on Lesion Size along with the Bosniak Renal Cyst Classification

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hanwk@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To identify size criteria for complex cystic renal masses that can distinguish renal cell carcinoma from benign cysts supplementing the Bosniak classification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed the records of 97 patients who underwent surgery for complex cystic renal masses from January 2001 to April 2010. The pathological results were compared with the lesion sizes measured by preoperative computed tomography and other radiological features (contrast enhancement, irregularities of cyst walls and septa, and calcification) were also obtained for categorization according to the Bosniak renal cyst classification.
RESULTS
Malignancy was significantly associated with cyst size (>2 cm), male gender, and younger patient age (<50 years). According to the Bosniak classification, there was no category I cyst, and all 8 category II cysts were benign. However, 3 of 18 (17%) category IIF cysts, 21 of 39 (54%) category III cysts, and 29 of 32 (90%) category IV cysts were malignant. All category IIF cysts were benign in patients older than 50 years of age.
CONCLUSION
Many complex cystic renal masses smaller than 2 cm were benign. We suggest that lesion size should be taken into account when formulating treatment plans for complex cystic renal masses.

Keyword

Kidney; cysts; kidney diseases; cystic; carcinoma; renal cell; computed tomography; X-ray

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis/radiography
Child
Child, Preschool
*Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Infant
Kidney Diseases, Cystic/*diagnosis/radiography
Kidney Neoplasms/*diagnosis/radiography
Male
Middle Aged
Sex Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult

Reference

1. Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology. 1986. 158:1–10.
Article
2. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system. Urology. 2005. 66:484–488.
Article
3. Aronson S, Frazier HA, Baluch JD, Hartman DS, Christenson PJ. Cystic renal masses: usefulness of the Bosniak classification. Urol Radiol. 1991. 13:83–90.
Article
4. Wilson TE, Doelle EA, Cohan RH, Wojno K, Korobkin M. Cystic renal masses: a reevaluation of the usefulness of the Bosniak classification system. Acad Radiol. 1996. 3:564–570.
Article
5. Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP. CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. 169:813–818.
Article
6. Cloix P, Martin X, Pangaud C, Maréchal JM, Bouvier R, Barat D, et al. Surgical management of complex renal cysts: a series of 32 cases. J Urol. 1996. 156:28–30.
Article
7. Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. 175:339–342.
8. O'Malley RL, Godoy G, Hecht EM, Stifelman MD, Taneja SS. Bosniak category IIF designation and surgery for complex renal cysts. J Urol. 2009. 182:1091–1095.
9. Bosniak MA. Problems in the radiologic diagnosis of renal parenchymal tumors. Urol Clin North Am. 1993. 20:217–230.
Article
10. Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. 169:819–821.
Article
11. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Follow-up CT of moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. 181:627–633.
Article
12. Schachter LR, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Smith JA Jr, Dietrich MS, Jayaram G, et al. Second prize: frequency of benign renal cortical tumors and histologic subtypes based on size in a contemporary series: what to tell our patients. J Endourol. 2007. 21:819–823.
Article
13. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol. 2003. 170(6 Pt 1):2217–2220.
Article
14. Gillett MD, Cheville JC, Karnes RJ, Lohse CM, Kwon ED, Leibovich BC, et al. Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses. J Urol. 2005. 173:1893–1896.
Article
15. Zisman A, Patard JJ, Raz O, Klatte T, Haifler M, Mendlovic S, et al. Sex, age, and surgeon decision on nephron-sparing surgery are independent predictors of renal masses with benign histologic findings--a multicenter survey. Urology. 2010. 76:541–546.
Article
16. Park SY, Jeon SS, Lee SY, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM, et al. Incidence and predictive factors of benign renal lesions in Korean patients with preoperative imaging diagnoses of renal cell carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2011. 26:360–364.
Article
17. Prasad SR, Dalrymple NC, Surabhi VR. Cross-sectional imaging evaluation of renal masses. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008. 46:95–111.
Article
18. Wallis MC, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, Bägli DJ, Khoury AE, Pippi Salle JL. Risk assessment of incidentally detected complex renal cysts in children: potential role for a modification of the Bosniak classification. J Urol. 2008. 180:317–321.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr