Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2008 Mar;1(1):10-14. 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.1.10.

Clinical Outcomes of Cochlear Reimplantation Due to Device Failure

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, College of Medicine and Research Center for Sensory Organs, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. chongkim@snu.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of cochlear reimplantation due to device failure. METHODS: The medical records of 30 patients who had undergone a revision cochlear implantation were retrospectively reviewed. Causes of revision operations, number of electrode channels inserted, and postoperative speech performances were analyzed. RESULTS: Device failure (N=12, 38.7%) and hematoma (N=3, 9.6%) were the two most common reasons for revision surgery. In patients with device failure, the number of electrode channels reinserted was equal to, or more than the number of channels inserted during initial implantation. Speech performance scores remained the same, or improved after reimplantation in patients with device failure. CONCLUSION: Device failure was the most common cause of revision operation in patients with cochlear implanttion. Contrary to expectation, new electrodes were fully inserted without difficulty in all reimplantation cases. Intracochlear damage due to reimplantation appeared to be clinically insignificant.

Keyword

Cochlear implantation; Revision; Device failure; Deaf; Reimplantation

MeSH Terms

Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Electrodes
Equipment Failure
Hematoma
Humans
Medical Records
Replantation
Retrospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Speech perception performance of patients by the Phoneme balanced word test: eight patients (66.6%) demonstrated improved speech perception performance after reimplantation, and 4 patients (33.3%) demonstrated little or no change.

  • Fig. 2 Speech perception performance of patients by the KCID-sentences test: seven patients (58.3%) showed improved speech perception performance after reimplantation, and 5 (41.6%) showed little or no change.K-CID test: Korean version of the central institute for the deaf test.


Cited by  1 articles

Sound Processor Replacement in Patients with Cochlear Implant: Analysis of a 30-Year Single-Institutional Experience
Myung Jin Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Jae Yeon Mun, Kyu-Yup Lee
Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2021;64(7):467-472.    doi: 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2020.00570.


Reference

1. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Cochlear implantation in children younger than 2 years old. Am J Otol. 1998; 3. 19(2):158–162. PMID: 9520051.
2. Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, von der Haar-Heise S, Illg A, Bertram B, Battmer RD. Cochlear implantation in children under the age of two: the MHH experience with the CLARION cochlear implant. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999; 4. 177(1):44–49. PMID: 10214801.
3. Migirov L, Kronenberg J. Magnet displacement following cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2005; 7. 26(4):646–648. PMID: 16015161.
Article
4. Migirov L, Yakirevitch A, Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J. Acute otitis media and mastoiditis following cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 5. 70(5):899–903. PMID: 16309750.
Article
5. Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Gomez-Marin O, Bird PA, Dolan-Ash S, Butts S, et al. Cochlear reimplantation. Laryngoscope. 1999; 3. 109(3):351–355. PMID: 10089956.
Article
6. Windmill IM, Martinez SA, Nolph MB, Eisenmenger BA. Surgical and nonsurgical complications associated with cochlear prosthesis implantation. Am J Otol. 1990; 11. 11(6):415–420. PMID: 2285061.
7. Miyamoto RT, Svirsky MA, Myres WA, Kirk KI, Schulte J. Cochlear implant reimplantation. Am J Otol. 1997; 11. 18(6 Suppl):S60–S61. PMID: 9391599.
8. Henson AM, Slattery WH 3rd, Luxford WM, Mills DM. Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Otol. 1999; 1. 20(1):56–64. PMID: 9918174.
9. Lassig AA, Zwolan TA, Telian SA. Cochlear implant failures and revision. Otol Neurotol. 2005; 7. 26(4):624–634. PMID: 16015158.
Article
10. Migirov L, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Hildesheimer M, Kronenberg J. Revision surgeries in cochlear implant patients: a review of 45 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 1. 264(1):3–7. PMID: 17009020.
Article
11. Roland JT Jr, Huang TC, Cohen NL. Revision cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006; 8. 39(4):833–839. PMID: 16895788.
Article
12. Alexiades G, Roland JT Jr, Fishman AJ, Shapiro W, Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results. Laryngoscope. 2001; 9. 111(9):1608–1613. PMID: 11568614.
Article
13. Weise JB, Muller-Deile J, Brademann G, Meyer JE, Ambrosch P, Maune S. Impact to the head increases cochlear implant reimplantation rate in children. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005; 12. 32(4):339–343. PMID: 15923099.
Article
14. Fayad JN, Baino T, Parisier SC. Revision cochlear implant surgery: causes and outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 10. 131(4):429–432. PMID: 15467612.
Article
15. Battmer RD, O'Donoghue GM, Lenarz T. A multicenter study of device failure in European cochlear implant centers. Ear Hear. 2007; 4. 28(2 Suppl):95S–99S. PMID: 17496657.
Article
16. Hoffman RA, Cohen NL. Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995; 9. 166:420–422. PMID: 7668733.
17. Luetje CM, Jackson K. Cochlear implants in children: what constitutes a complication? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 9. 117(3 Pt 1):243–247. PMID: 9334772.
Article
18. Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL. Cochlear implant mechanical failures. Am J Otol. 1996; 9. 17(5):730–734. PMID: 8892569.
19. Fayad JN, Eisenberg LS, Gillinger M, Winter M, Martinez AS, Luxford WM. Clinical performance of children following revision surgery for a cochlear implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 3. 134(3):379–384. PMID: 16500431.
Article
20. Simmons FB, Schuknecht HF, Smith L. Histopathology of an ear after 5 years of electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986; Mar–Apr. 95(2 Pt 1):132–136. PMID: 3754409.
Article
21. Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Xu SA, Pyman BC. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque. Am J Otol. 1995; 3. 16(2):186–199. PMID: 8572119.
22. Fayad J, Linthicum FH Jr, Otto SR, Galey FR, House WF. Cochlear implants: histopathologic findings related to performance in 16 human temporal bones. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991; 10. 100(10):807–811. PMID: 1952646.
Article
23. Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL, Suh GD. Outcome analysis of cochlear implant reimplantation in children. Laryngoscope. 2001; 1. 111(1):26–32. PMID: 11192895.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr