Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2008 Mar;1(1):1-9. 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.1.1.

Nasal Reconstruction in the 21st Century: A Contemporary Review

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesvill, USA. SPark@virginia.edu

Abstract

Nasal restoration in the 21st century has reached a new milestone that has brought together centuries of experiences, lessons, errors, and rewards. The bar has been set and it is nothing less than a restoration of normal function and complete social acceptance. The aesthetic expectations of both minor and major nasal repair include symmetry, natural contour, excellent color and texture match, and a final product that remains inconspicuous to the casual observer. The major tenets that have been realized today include the wide application of the subunit principle, liberal and nonanatomic cartilage grafting (for form and function), and addressing each of the three layers of the nose independently. Anticipating resultant scars and vectors of tension during wound healing are the subtle nuances of nasal reconstruction that ensure a pleasing result. The robust nature of the forehead flap has proven to be a workhorse for major nasal resurfacing.

Keyword

Nasal Reconstruction; Forehead Flap; Mohs Defect

MeSH Terms

Cartilage
Cicatrix
Dietary Sucrose
Forehead
Nose
Reward
Social Distance
Transplants
Wound Healing
Dietary Sucrose

Cited by  1 articles

Tumor Control and Quality of Life in Skin Cancer Patients With Extensive Multilayered Nasal Defects
Michaela Plath, Hannah M. Thielen, Ingo Baumann, Karim Zaoui, Philippe A. Federspil
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;13(2):164-172.    doi: 10.21053/ceo.2019.00192.


Reference

1. Sushruta S. KK Bhishagratna. The Sushruta Samhita. 1907. Calcutta (India): Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna.
2. Larrabbee WF Jr, Sherris DA. Larrabee WF, Sherris DA, editors. Nose. Principles of facial reconstruction. 1995. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven Publishers;p. 68–119.
3. Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 8. 76(2):239–247. PMID: 4023097.
Article
4. Converse JM. New forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. Proc R Soc Med. 1942; 10. 35(12):811–812.
5. Ugur MB, Savranlar A, Uzun L, Küçüker H, Cinar F. A reliable surface landmark for localizing supratrochlear artery: medial canthus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 2. 138(2):162–165. PMID: 18241709.
Article
6. Quatela VC, Sherris DA, Rounds MF. Esthetic refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 10. 121(10):1106–1113. PMID: 7546577.
Article
7. Menick FJ. Baker SR, Swanson NA, editors. Reconstruction of the nose. Local flaps in facial reconstruction. 1995. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Year Book, Inc;p. 305–344.
8. Park SS, Cook TA, Wang TD. The epithelial 'turn-in' flap in nasal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 10. 121(10):1122–1127. PMID: 7546579.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr