J Korean Fract Soc.  2013 Jan;26(1):44-49. 10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.1.44.

A Comparison between Compression Hip Screw and Intramedullary Nail for the Treatment of AO/OTA A2.2 Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea. cbg1196@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the result between the compression hip screw (CHS) and intramedullary (IM) nail for the treatment of AO/OTA A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 95 cases of AO/OTA A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture, which were treated with CHS or IM nail by one surgeon from March 1994 to December 2009. One group was treated with CHS (Group I, 28 cases) and the other was treated with IM nail (Group II, 67 cases). We evaluated the mean operation time, the amount of bleeding and transfusion, hospital duration, radiological results and the clinical outcome with the mobility score of Parker and Palmer.
RESULTS
Radiologically, the tip-apex distance, change of neck-shaft angle, and union time were not significantly different between both groups (p>0.05). Clinically, the mean operation time, the amount of bleeding and transfusion, hospital duration and the mobility score were not significantly different (p>0.05). The post-operative complications were lag screw slippage over 25 mm (1 case) and loosening of device (1 case) in group I. In group II, there were perforation of the femoral head (1 case), nail breakage (1 case) and deep infection (1 case).
CONCLUSION
There was no significant differences that are clinical and radiological results in the treatment of AO/OTA A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture, using CHS and IM nail.

Keyword

Femur; Intertrochanteric fractures; Compression hip screw; Intramedullary nailing

MeSH Terms

Femoral Fractures
Femur
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
Head
Hemorrhage
Hip
Hip Fractures
Nails
Retrospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) A sixty seven-year-old woman sustained left hip fracture. (B) The fracture type was AO/OTA 31-A2.2 which was confirmed by 3-dimensional computed tomography scan. (C) The fracture was closely reduced and fixed with compression hip screw. (D) Final follow-up radiograph shows solid union and 5 mm lag screw sliding.

  • Fig. 2 (A) A seventy nine-year-old man sustained left intertrochanteric femoral fracture. (B) The fracture type was AO/OTA 31-A2.2 which was confirmed by 3-dimensional computed tomography scan. (C) The fracture was closely reduced and fixed with intramedullary nail. (D) Final follow-up radiographs show solid union without lag screw sliding.


Cited by  1 articles

A Comparison of Clinical Results between Compression Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail as the Treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2.2 Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
Phil Hyun Chung, Suk Kang, Jong Pil Kim, Young Sung Kim, Ho Min Lee, In Hwa Back, Kyeong Soo Eom
J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2016;51(6):493-502.    doi: 10.4055/jkoa.2016.51.6.493.


Reference

1. Babst R, Renner N, Biedermann M, et al. Clinical results using the trochanter stabilizing plate (TSP): the modular extension of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) for internal fixation of selected unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. 12:392–399.
Article
2. Banan H, Al-Sabti A, Jimulia T, Hart AJ. The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)-our first 60 cases. Injury. 2002. 33:401–405.
Article
3. Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, Greenwood R, Harries WJ, Chesser TJ. A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. 92:792–798.
Article
4. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991. 73:330–334.
Article
5. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS. Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury. 1995. 26:615–618.
Article
6. Chang JS, Lee SH, Jay SC, et al. Treatment of comminuted trochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw and DHS trochanter stabilizing plate. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1997. 32:1206–1213.
Article
7. Chevalley F, Gamba D. Gamma nailing of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: clinical results of a series of 63 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1997. 11:412–415.
Article
8. Evans EM. Trochanteric fractures; a review of 110 cases treated by nail-plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951. 33B:192–204.
9. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004. 124:31–37.
Article
10. Gotfried Y. The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the reconstruction of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. (425):82–86.
11. Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hipscrew with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998. 80:618–630.
Article
12. Jensen JS, Sonne-Holm S, Tøndevold E. Unstable trochanteric fractures. A comparative analysis of four methods of internal fixation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980. 51:949–962.
Article
13. Kim TH, Kim JO, Lee SY, Yun GU. Treatment of the unstable intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation: comparison with compression hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate. J Korean Fract Soc. 2010. 23:353–359.
Article
14. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures: II. Evaluation and treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994. 2:150–156.
Article
15. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007. 21:S1–S133.
16. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. (9):CD000093.
Article
17. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993. 75:797–798.
Article
18. Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS. A biomechanical evaluation of the gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992. 74:352–357.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKFS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr