J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2008 Nov;33(6):553-559. 10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.553.

The Effect of Temporary Filling Materials on The Adhesion between Dentin Adhesive-coated Surface and Resin Inlay

• Kim TG
• Lee KW
• Yu MK

• KMID: 1428466
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.553

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to compare the microtensile bond strength of resin coated surface and resin inlay according temporary filling materials prior to applying self-adhesive resin cement. Caviton(GC, Japan), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany), Provifil(Promedica, Neumunster, Germany) & petrolatum, and Eugenol-based cement, Tembond(Kerr, Orange CA, USA) were used as temporary filling materials. After fabrication of Tescera(Bisco, Schamburg IL, USA), it was bonded with a self-adhesive resin cement, Rely X unicem(3M, St. Paul. Minn, USA). After this procedure, the microtensile bond strength was measured and it was analyzed through one-way ANOVA and Duncan test(p<0.05). Caviton(GC, Tokyo, Japan) showed statistical difference except for the control(group I) and the saliva(group II)(p<0.05). Provifil(group IV), Provifil & petroneum(group V), Tembond(group VI) had lower microtensile bond strength.

Keyword

Low-viscosity composite resin; Microtensile bond strength; Resin-coating surface; Caviton; Tembond; Provifil

MeSH Terms

Analysis of Variance
Calcium Sulfate
Citrus sinensis
Dental Cements
Dentin
Inlays
Petrolatum
Resin Cements
Root Canal Filling Materials
Tokyo
Vinyl Compounds
Zinc Oxide
Calcium Sulfate
Dental Cements
Petrolatum
Resin Cements
Root Canal Filling Materials
Vinyl Compounds
Zinc Oxide

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Diagram of specimen preparation

• 

  Figure 2 Diagram of measuring microtensile bond strength

• 

  Figure 3 Diagram of microtensile bond strength measured. *significance at the level of p<0.05

• 

  Figure 4 Resin surface removed temporary materials

Reference

1. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. I. Minimally intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:7–16.

2. Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Tagami J. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin-effect of bonding environment. Oper Dent. 1996. 21:196–202.

3. Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. The resin-coating technique. Effect of a single-step bonding system on dentin bond stregths. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:293–300.

4. Satoh M, Inai N, NIkaido T. How to use Liner Bond System as a dentin and pulp protector in indirect restorations. J Jpn Adhes Dent. 1994. 12:41–47.

5. Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000. 131:1197–1199.

6. Okuda M, Nikaido T, Maruoka R, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007. 19:38–48.

7. Begazo CC, de Boer HD, Kleverlaan CJ, van Waas MA, Feilzer AJ. Shear bond strength of different types of luting cements to an aluminum oxide reinforced glass ceramic core material. Dent Mater. 2004. 20(10):901–907.

8. Kurosaki N, Kubota M, Yamamoto Y, Fusayama T. The effect of etching on the dentin of the clinical cavity floor. Quintessence int. 1990. 21:87–92.

9. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Hickel , Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater. 2002. 18(3):269–275.

10. Kim DW, Park SJ, Choi KK. Compatibility of Self-etching Dentin Adhesives with Resin Luting Cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005. 30(6):493–504.

11. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson C. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent. 1996. 9:57–60.

12. Satoh M, Inai N, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. How to use Liner Bond System as a dentin and pulp protector in indirect restorations. J Jpn Adhes Dent. 1994. 12:41–47.

13. Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Tagamai J. The Resin-coating technique. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:293–300.

14. De Goes MF, Nikaido T, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Early bond strengths of dual-cured resin cement to resin-coated dentin. J Dent Res. 2000. 79(special issue):453.

15. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. Dent Mater. 2007. 23:279–287.

16. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "Resin Coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:28–35.

17. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004. May-Jun. 17(3):357–363.

18. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagamai J. Effects of saliva contamination on dentin bond strength using all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2006. 8:311–318.

19. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements of bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 1998. 23:55–62.

20. Leirskar J, Nordbo H. The effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on the shear bond strength of a commonly used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000. 16:265–268.

21. al-Wazzan KA, al-Harbi AA, Hammand IA. The effect of eugenol containing temporary cement on the bond strength of two resin composite core materials to dentin. J Prosthodont. 1997. 6:37–42.

22. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001. 26:556–561.

23. Cho NY, Lee IB. Polymerization Shrinkage, Hygroscopic Expansion and Microleakage of Resin-based Temporary Filling Materials. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008. 33(2):115–124.