J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc.  2009 Dec;5(2):93-98. 10.13004/jknts.2009.5.2.93.

Clinical Features of Mild Head Injury in the Elderly

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongju Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medine, Gyeongju, Korea. leeyb@dongguk.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
In the case of mild head injuries, patients are generally expected to make a full recovery; however, for seniors, the prognosis is often less favorable. Therefore, this study will investigate clinical features and prognosis of mild head injury in patients who are 65 and older.
METHODS
Between March 2006 to February 2008, a total of 76 elderly patients were admitted with a head injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of between 13 and 15. Retrospective analysis was performed based on the patients' age, gender, cause of injury, medical history, CT diagnosis, GCS score at the time of admittance and clinical outcome.
RESULTS
CT scan revealed abnormal findings in 38 cases (50%), and of those 12 cases showed acute subdural hematoma and 11 cases showed hemorrhagic contusion. When initial GCS scores and CT scans were examined, lower GCS scores were more likely to have abnormal CT scans, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.005). When initial GCS scores and the patient outcome were examined, lower GCS scores correlated with adverse outcomes, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.047).
CONCLUSION
Initial CT scans revealed abnormal findings in 50% of the patients, which demonstrates the need for a mandatory CT scans and follow up observations, even for elderly patients who initially do not display loss of consciousness. In addition, aggressive therapy is especially crucial in cases with abnormal initial CT findings to minimize morbidity and mortality in elderly patients.

Keyword

Elderly; Mild head injury; CT scan; Falling; Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Aged
Contusions
Craniocerebral Trauma
Follow-Up Studies
Glasgow Coma Scale
Head
Hematoma, Subdural, Acute
Humans
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Unconsciousness

Reference

1. Amacher AL, Bybee DF. Toleration of head injury by the elderly. Neurosurgery. 1987; 20:954–958.
Article
2. Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R. The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg. 1977; 47:491–502.
3. Culotta VP, Sementilli ME, Gerold K, Watts CC. Clinicopathological heterogeneity in the classification of mild head injury. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38:245–250.
Article
4. Demarest GB, Osler TM. Injuries in the elderly. Geriatrics. 1990; 45:36–42.
5. DeMaria EJ, Kenny PR, Merrian MA, Casanova LA, Gann DS. Aggressive trauma care benefits the elderly. J Trauma. 1987; 27:1200–1206.
Article
6. Duus BG, Boesen T, Kruse KV, Nielsen KB. Prognostic signs in the evaluation of patients with minor head injury. Br J Surg. 1993; 80:988–991.
Article
7. Flanagan SR, Hibbard MR, Riordan B, Gordon WA. Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: diagnostic and treatment challenges. Clin Geriatr Med. 2006; 22:449–468.
Article
8. Grisso JA, Schwarz DF, Wishner AR, Weene B, Holmes JH, Sutton RL. Injuries in an elderly inner-city population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990; 38:1326–1331.
Article
9. Harad FT, Kerstein MD. Inadequacy of bedside clinical indicators in identifying significant intracrnial injury in trauma paatients. J Trauma. 1992; 32:359–361.
10. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Millis TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:100–105.
Article
11. Hsiang JNK, Yeung T, Yu AL, Poon WS. High-risk mild head injury. J Neurosurg. 1997; 87:234–238.
Article
12. Ibañez J, Arikan F, Pedraza S, Sáchez E, Poca MA, Rodriguez D, et al. Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100:825–834.
Article
13. Jacobs DG. Special considerations in geriatric injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003; 9:535–539.
Article
14. Jacoby SF, Ackerson TH, Richmond TS. Outcome from serious injury in older adults. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006; 38:133–140.
Article
15. Jeret JS, Mandell M, Anziska B, Lipitz M, Vilceus AP, Wave JA, et al. Clinical predictors of abnormality disclosed by computed tomography after mild head trauma. Neurosurgery. 1993; 32:9–15.
Article
16. Kilaru S, Grab J, Emhoff T, Fiallo V, Simon B, Sweiencicki T, et al. Long-term functional status and mortality of elderly patients with severe closed head injuries. J Trauma. 1996; 41:957–963.
Article
17. Kim WH, Lee KS, Bae HG, Yun IG, Lee IS. A clinical analysis on 1,000 consecutive head injuries. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1989; 18:290–300.
18. Lee K, Lee KS, Bae HG, Yun IG, Lee IS. Characteristics of head injury in the aged. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 1990; 19:1001–1008.
19. Lee WY, Kim OL, Choi BY, Kim SH. Clinical features of geriatric moderate and severe head injury. J Korean Soc Geriatr Neurosurg. 2007; 3:160–168.
20. Lucht U. A prospective study of accidental falls and resulting injuries in the home among elderly people. Acta Sociomed Scand. 1971; 3:105–120.
21. Myers AH, Baker SP, Van Natta ML, Abbey H, Robinson EG. Risk factors associated with falls and injuries among elderly institutionalized persons. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 133:1179–1190.
Article
22. Nagurney JT, Borczuk P, Thomas SH. Elderly patients with closed head trauma after a fall: mechanisms and outcomes. J Emerg Med. 1998; 16:709–713.
Article
23. Narayan RK, Greenburg RP, Miller JD, Enas GG, Choi SC, Kishore PR, et al. Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative anlysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 1981; 54:751–762.
24. Nielson C. Pharmacologic considerations in critical care of the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 1994; 10:71–89.
Article
25. Oreskovich MR, Howard JD, Copass MK, Carrico CJ. Geriatric trauma: injury pattern and outcome. J Trauma. 1984; 24:565–572.
26. Park YS, Kim HJ, Whang K, Pyen JS, Hu C, Hong SK, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of mild head injury in the elderly. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2002; 31:564–568.
27. Rapoport ML, Feinstein A. Outcome following traumatic brain injury in the elderly: a critical review. Brain Inj. 2000; 14:749–761.
28. Ross AM, Pitts LH, Kobayashi S. Prognostications of outcome after major head injury in the elderly. J Neurosci Nurs. 1992; 24:88–93.
29. Santora TA, Schinco MA, Trooskin SZ. Management of trauma in the elderly patient. Surg Clin North Am. 1994; 74:163–186.
Article
30. Sattin RW, Lambert Huber DA, DeVito CA, Rodriguez JG, Ros A, Bacchelli S, et al. The incidence of fall injury events among the elderly in a defined population. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 131:1028–1037.
Article
31. Servadei F, Ciucci G, Loroni L, Cuscini M, Piola C, Arista A. Diagnosis and management of minor head injury: a regional multicenter approach in Italy. J Trauma. 1995; 39:696–701.
32. Susman M, DiRusso SM, Sullivan T, Risucci D, Nealon P, Cuff S, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: increased mortality and worse functional outcome at discharge despite lower injury severity. J Trauma. 2002; 53:219–223.
Article
33. Tornetta P 3rd, Mostafavi H, Riina J, Turen C, Reimer B, Levine R, et al. Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 1999; 46:702–706.
Article
34. van Aalst JA, Morris JA Jr, Yaytes HK, Miller RS, Bass SM. Severely injured geriatric patients return to independent living: a study of factors influencing function and independence. J Trauma. 1991; 31:1096–1101.
35. Zwimpfer TJ, Moulton RJ. Neurologic trauma concerns. Crit Care Clin. 1993; 9:727–739.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNTS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr