1. Walker WJ, Pelage JP. Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG. 2002. 109:1262–1272.
2. Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 98:29–34.
3. Hovsepian DM, Siskin GP, Bonn J, Cardella JF, Clark TW, Lampmann LE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009. 20:7 Suppl. S193–S199.
4. Funaki K, Fukunishi H, Sawada K. Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. 34:584–589.
5. Oguchi O, Mori A, Kobayashi Y, Horiuchi A, Nikaido T, Fujii S. Prediction of histopathologic features and proliferative activity of uterine leiomyoma by magnetic resonance imaging prior to GnRH analogue therapy: correlation between T2-weighted images and effect of GnRH analogue. J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995). 1995. 21:107–117.
6. Takahashi K, Okada M, Imaoka I, Sugimura K, Miyazaki K. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting efficacy of GnRH analogue treatment for uterine leiomyoma. Hum Reprod. 2001. 16:1989–1994.
7. Harman M, Zeteroğlu S, Arslan H, Sengül M, Etlik O. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging signal and contrast-enhancement characteristics on post-embolization volume reduction of uterine fibroids. Acta Radiol. 2006. 47:427–435.
8. Swe TT, Onitsuka H, Kawamoto K, Ueyama T, Tsuruchi N, Masuda K. Uterine leiomyoma: correlation between signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic characteristics. Radiat Med. 1992. 10:235–242.
9. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Perez-Jaffe LA, Tureck RW. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics. 1999. 19:1179–1197.
10. Burn PR, McCall JM, Chinn RJ, Vashisht A, Smith JR, Healy JC. Uterine fibroleiomyoma: MR imaging appearances before and after embolization of uterine arteries. Radiology. 2000. 214:729–734.
11. Orsini LF, Salardi S, Pilu G, Bovicelli L, Cacciari E. Pelvic organs in premenarcheal girls: real-time ultrasonography. Radiology. 1984. 153:113–116.
12. Spies JB, Spector A, Roth AR, Baker CM, Mauro L, Murphy-Skrynarz K. Complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 100(5 Pt 1):873–880.
13. Goodwin SC, Bonilla SM, Sacks D, Reed RA, Spies JB, Landow WJ, et al. Reporting standards for uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001. 12:1011–1020.
14. Yamashiro T, Gibo M, Utsunomiya T, Murayama S. Huge uterine leiomyoma with adenomyotic cysts mimicking uterine sarcoma on MR imaging. Radiat Med. 2007. 25:127–129.
15. Hamlin DJ, Pettersson H, Fitzsimmons J, Morgan LS. MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas and their complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985. 9:902–907.
16. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, Kataoka ML, Koyama T, Fujiwara T, et al. Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics. 1999. 19 Spec No:S131–S145.
17. Rajan DK, Margau R, Kroll RR, Simons ME, Tan KT, Jaskolka JD, et al. Clinical utility of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery embolization for presumed symptomatic fibroids. Clin Radiol. 2011. 66:57–62.
18. deSouza NM, Williams AD. Uterine arterial embolization for leiomyomas: perfusion and volume changes at MR imaging and relation to clinical outcome. Radiology. 2002. 222:367–374.
19. Hecht EM, Do RK, Kang SK, Bennett GL, Babb JS, Clark TW. Diffusion-weighted imaging for prediction of volumetric response of leiomyomas following uterine artery embolization: a preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011. 33:641–646.
20. Jain TP, Srivastava DN, Sahu RP, Thulkar S, Sharma S, Mittal S, et al. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids with imaging follow up. Australas Radiol. 2007. 51:246–252.