Yonsei Med J.  2012 Mar;53(2):408-415. 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.408.

Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fracture with an Interlocking Humeral Nail in Older Children and Adolescents

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pedhkim@yuhs.ac

Abstract

PURPOSE
Rigid interlocking nailing for femoral shaft fracture is ideal for use in adolescents in terms of stability of the fracture and convenience for the patient. However, numerous authors have reported that rigid interlocking nailing has some limitations in this age group due to the risk of complications. We evaluated the results of intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures with an interlocking humeral nail in older children and adolescents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated with an interlocking humeral nail. Radiographs were examined for proximal femoral change and evidence of osteonecrosis. Outcomes were assessed by major or minor complications that occurred after operative treatment.
RESULTS
Twenty-four femoral shaft fractures in 23 patients were enrolled. The mean age at the time of operation was 12 years and 8 months and the mean follow-up period was 21 months. Bony union was achieved in all patients without any complications related to the procedure such as infection, nonunion, malalignment and limb length discrepancy. All fractures were clinically and radiographically united within an average eight weeks. No patients developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head and coxa valga.
CONCLUSION
Intramedullary nailing through the greater trochanter using a rigid interlocking humeral nail is effective and safe for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in older children and adolescents.

Keyword

Children; adolescent; femoral shaft fracture; interlocking humeral nail; greater trochanter

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
*Bone Nails
Child
Female
Femoral Fractures/*surgery
Femur/injuries/surgery
Humans
Male
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The design of the unreamed humeral nail shows medial bending of the proximal nail end by 5°.

  • Fig. 2 A boy aged 11 years and 9 months (patient No. 3) had a shaft fracture of the femur. Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (A) show the proximal 1/3 shaft spiral fracture. Immediate postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (B) show internal fixation with unreamed humeral nail via the tip of the greater trochanter. Postoperative three-month follow-up anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (C) show bony union without complications. The boy has neither subjective nor objective discomfort with a full weight-bearing gait. The fifteen-month postoperative scanogram (D) after hardware removal shows no leg length discrepancy deformity or distortion of the proximal femoral area.


Reference

1. Rewers A, Hedegaard H, Lezotte D, Meng K, Battan FK, Emery K, et al. Childhood femur fractures, associated injuries, and sociodemographic risk factors: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2005. 115:e543–e552.
Article
2. Sahlin Y. Occurrence of fractures in a defined population: a 1-year study. Injury. 1990. 21:158–160.
Article
3. McCartney D, Hinton A, Heinrich SD. Operative stabilization of pediatric femur fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994. 25:635–650.
Article
4. Flynn JM, Luedtke L, Ganley TJ, Pill SG. Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: lessons from the learning curve. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002. 31:71–74.
5. Gordon JE, Khanna N, Luhmann SJ, Dobbs MB, Ortman MR, Schoenecker PL. Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in children through the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter using a modified rigid humeral intramedullary nail: preliminary results of a new technique in 15 children. J Orthop Trauma. 2004. 18:416–422.
Article
6. Kraus R, Schiefer U, Schäfer C, Meyer C, Schnettler R. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric femur and lower leg shaft fractures: intraoperative radiation load. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008. 28:14–16.
Article
7. Astion DJ, Wilber JH, Scoles PV. Avascular necrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis after intramedullary nailing for a fracture of the femoral shaft. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:1092–1094.
Article
8. Beaty JH, Austin SM, Warner WC, Canale ST, Nichols L. Interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in adolescents: preliminary results and complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994. 14:178–183.
Article
9. Buford D Jr, Christensen K, Weatherall P. Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998. 85–89.
Article
10. Mileski RA, Garvin KL, Huurman WW. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after closed intramedullary shortening in an adolescent. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995. 15:24–26.
Article
11. O'Malley DE, Mazur JM, Cummings RJ. Femoral head avascular necrosis associated with intramedullary nailing in an adolescent. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995. 15:21–23.
12. Gordon JE, Swenning TA, Burd TA, Szymanski DA, Schoenecker PL. Proximal femoral radiographic changes after lateral transtrochanteric intramedullary nail placement in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. 85-A:1295–1301.
Article
13. Momberger N, Stevens P, Smith J, Santora S, Scott S, Anderson J. Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000. 20:482–484.
Article
14. Timmerman LA, Rab GT. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in adolescents. J Orthop Trauma. 1993. 7:331–337.
Article
15. Townsend DR, Hoffinger S. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in children via the trochanter tip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000. 113–118.
Article
16. González-Herranz P, Burgos-Flores J, Rapariz JM, Lopez-Mondejar JA, Ocete JG, Amaya S. Intramedullary nailing of the femur in children. Effects on its proximal end. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995. 77:262–266.
17. Raney EM, Ogden JA, Grogan DP. Premature greater trochanteric epiphysiodesis secondary to intramedullary femoral rodding. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993. 13:516–520.
Article
18. Cuttica D, Klingele K. Pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures; a comparison of outcomes between flexible intramedullary nailing versus rigid intramedullary nailing. 2009. 05. 02. Boston: POSNA.
19. Ho CA, Skaggs DL, Tang CW, Kay RM. Use of flexible intramedullary nails in pediatric femur fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006. 26:497–504.
Article
20. Sink EL, Gralla J, Repine M. Complications of pediatric femur fractures treated with titanium elastic nails: a comparison of fracture types. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005. 25:577–580.
Article
21. Garner MR, Bhat SB, Khujanazarov I, Flynn JM, Spiegel D. Fixation of length-stable femoral shaft fractures in heavier children: flexible nails vs rigid locked nails. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011. 31:11–16.
22. Leet AI, Pichard CP, Ain MC. Surgical treatment of femoral fractures in obese children: does excessive body weight increase the rate of complications? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005. 87:2609–2613.
23. Aksoy MC, Caglar O, Ayvaz M, Yazici M, Alpaslan AM. Treatment of complicated pediatric femoral fractures with titanium elastic nail. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2008. 17:7–10.
Article
24. Kanellopoulos AD, Yiannakopoulos CK, Soucacos PN. Closed, locked intramedullary nailing of pediatric femoral shaft fractures through the tip of the greater trochanter. J Trauma. 2006. 60:217–222.
Article
25. Mehlman CT, Nemeth NM, Glos DL. Antegrade versus retrograde titanium elastic nail fixation of pediatric distal-third femoral-shaft fractures: a mechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2006. 20:608–612.
Article
26. Corry IS, Nicol RO. Limb length after fracture of the femoral shaft in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995. 15:217–219.
Article
27. Bopst L, Reinberg O, Lutz N. Femur fracture in preschool children: experience with flexible intramedullary nailing in 72 children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007. 27:299–303.
28. Carey TP, Galpin RD. Flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 110–118.
Article
29. Gardner MJ, Lawrence BD, Griffith MH. Surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004. 16:51–57.
Article
30. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. 1984. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. 83-A:1912.
31. Küntscher G. [Intramedullary nailing of comminuted fractures]. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1968. 322:1063–1069.
32. Galpin RD, Willis RB, Sabano N. Intramedullary nailing of pediatric femoral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994. 14:184–189.
Article
33. Ziv I, Blackburn N, Rang M. Femoral intramedullary nailing in the growing child. J Trauma. 1984. 24:432–434.
Article
34. Mani US, Sabatino CT, Sabharwal S, Svach DJ, Suslak A, Behrens FF. Biomechanical comparison of flexible stainless steel and titanium nails with external fixation using a femur fracture model. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006. 26:182–187.
Article
35. Litt R, Albassir A, Willems S, Debry R. [Coxa vara. Isolated growth of the greater trochanter. Prevention-treatment]. Acta Orthop Belg. 1990. 56:301–306.
36. Bienkowski P, Harvey EJ, Reindl R, Berry GK, Benaroch TE, Ouellet JA. The locked flexible intramedullary humerus nail in pediatric femur and tibia shaft fractures: a feasibility study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004. 24:634–637.
Article
37. Georgiadis GM, Olexa TA, Ebraheim NA. Entry sites for antegrade femoral nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 281–287.
Article
38. Flynn JM, Hresko T, Reynolds RA, Blasier RD, Davidson R, Kasser J. Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001. 21:4–8.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr