Yonsei Med J.  2012 Mar;53(2):241-247. 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.241.

Autophagy in Innate Recognition of Pathogens and Adaptive Immunity

Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Host Defenses, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea. heungkyu.lee@kaist.ac.kr

Abstract

Autophagy is a specialized cellular pathway involved in maintaining homeostasis by degrading long-lived cellular proteins and organelles. Recent studies have demonstrated that autophagy is utilized by immune systems to protect host cells from invading pathogens and regulate uncontrolled immune responses. During pathogen recognition, induction of autophagy by pattern recognition receptors leads to the promotion or inhibition of consequent signaling pathways. Furthermore, autophagy plays a role in the delivery of pathogen signatures in order to promote the recognition thereof by pattern recognition receptors. In addition to innate recognition, autophagy has been shown to facilitate MHC class II presentation of intracellular antigens to activate CD4 T cells. In this review, we describe the roles of autophagy in innate recognition of pathogens and adaptive immunity, such as antigen presentation, as well as the clinical relevance of autophagy in the treatment of human diseases.

Keyword

Autophagy; pathogen recognition; pattern recognition receptors; antigen presentation

MeSH Terms

Adaptive Immunity/immunology/*physiology
Animals
Antigen Presentation/immunology/physiology
Autophagy/immunology/*physiology
Humans
Major Histocompatibility Complex/immunology/physiology

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Autophagy contributes to innate and adaptive immune responses against pathogens. (A) TLR promotes the induction of autophagy for pathogen elimination. TLR4 signaling via the TRIF-p38 axis, but not via MyD88, induces the formation of autophagosome and subsequent elimination of Mycobacteria bacilli. TLR7 signaling induced by two different ligands, single-stranded RNA and imiquimod, induces the formation of an autophagosome to eliminate Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Atgs, such as Atg5, beclin and PI3K, are required for the formation of autophagosomes via TLR stimulation. In another case, Atg facilitates the TLR-dependent elimination of pathogens by promoting phagosome maturation. When zymosan (a particle of fungal cell walls) is phagocytosed, TLR2 induces the recruitment of LC3 to the phagosomal membrane, leading to the maturation of phagosomes and elimination of the fungus. This process depends on Atg5 and Atg7. (B) Autophagy supports antiviral responses by promoting viral sensing. In pDCs, autophagy mediates the recognition of the virus infection by delivering viral replication intermediates in the cytosol to lysosomes, where TLR recognition occurs. However, in non-pDCs, autophagy negatively regulates antiviral type I IFN responses. The Atg5-Agt12 conjugate directly associates with CARD domains of RIG-I, a cytosolic receptor for viral nucleic acids, and IPS-1, suppressing type I IFN production. Consequently in Atg5-deficient MEFs, RLR signaling results in overproduction of type I IFNs and resistance to VSV infection. In cases of dsDNA recognition, STING, a multispanning membrane protein, is translocated from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and assembled with TBK1, which phosphorylates the transcription factor IRF3, resulting in the production of type I IFN. Atg9a, an essential component of autophagy, is co-localized with STING in the Golgi apparatus and controls the dynamic translocation of STING and assembly with TBK1. In Atg9a-deficient MEFs, the translocation of STING from the Golgi apparatus to the cytoplasmic punctate structures and assembly with TBK1 are greatly enhanced, which, in turn, induces aberrant activation of type I IFN responses. (C) Atg16L1 regulates endotoxin-induced inflammasome activation. In autophagy-deficient cells, IL-1β and IL-18 production is enhanced in response to LPS. Macrophages lacking Atg16L1 induce high-levels of ROS, which, in turn, activates caspase-1, leading to the processing of IL-1β. However, in macrophages of wild-type mice, generation of ROS is inhibited by autophagy-related protein, leading to limited production of IL-1β. (D) Autophagy is involved in MHC class II processing and presentation of intracellular antigens to CD4 T cells. Intracellular antigens are engulfed by autophagosomes, transported to MHC class II loading compartments (MIIC), and then loaded onto MHC class II molecules for presentation to CD4 T cells. TLR, toll-like receptor; Atg, autophagy-related genes; pDCs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells; CARD, caspase recruitment domain; RIG-I, retinoic acid inducible gene I; MEFs, mouse embryonic fibroblasts; RLR, RIG-I-like receptor; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; STING, stimulator of IFN genes; TBK1, TANK-binding kinase 1; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TRIF, TIR domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; IFN, interferon; IPS-1, IFN-β promoter stimulator-1; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; IL, interleukin; MHC, major histocompatibility complex.


Reference

1. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science. 2000. 290:1717–1721.
Article
2. Kuma A, Hatano M, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakaya H, Yoshimori T, et al. The role of autophagy during the early neonatal starvation period. Nature. 2004. 432:1032–1036.
Article
3. Komatsu M, Waguri S, Ueno T, Iwata J, Murata S, Tanida I, et al. Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice. J Cell Biol. 2005. 169:425–434.
Article
4. Mizushima N, Klionsky DJ. Protein turnover via autophagy: implications for metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007. 27:19–40.
Article
5. Massey AC, Zhang C, Cuervo AM. Chaperone-mediated autophagy in aging and disease. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006. 73:205–235.
Article
6. Cuervo AM, Dice JF. Unique properties of lamp2a compared to other lamp2 isoforms. J Cell Sci. 2000. 113(Pt 24):4441–4450.
Article
7. Cuervo AM, Dice JF. A receptor for the selective uptake and degradation of proteins by lysosomes. Science. 1996. 273:501–503.
Article
8. Chiang HL, Terlecky SR, Plant CP, Dice JF. A role for a 70-kilodalton heat shock protein in lysosomal degradation of intracellular proteins. Science. 1989. 246:382–385.
Article
9. Mizushima N, Noda T, Yoshimori T, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, George MD, et al. A protein conjugation system essential for autophagy. Nature. 1998. 395:395–398.
Article
10. Klionsky DJ, Cregg JM, Dunn WA Jr, Emr SD, Sakai Y, Sandoval IV, et al. A unified nomenclature for yeast autophagy-related genes. Dev Cell. 2003. 5:539–545.
Article
11. Mizushima N, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Cell Struct Funct. 2002. 27:421–429.
Article
12. Levine B, Klionsky DJ. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell. 2004. 6:463–477.
13. Shintani T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in health and disease: a double-edged sword. Science. 2004. 306:990–995.
Article
14. Levine B, Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. 2008. 132:27–42.
Article
15. Kirkegaard K, Taylor MP, Jackson WT. Cellular autophagy: surrender, avoidance and subversion by microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004. 2:301–314.
Article
16. Levine B. Eating oneself and uninvited guests: autophagy-related pathways in cellular defense. Cell. 2005. 120:159–162.
Article
17. Brazil MI, Weiss S, Stockinger B. Excessive degradation of intracellular protein in macrophages prevents presentation in the context of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Eur J Immunol. 1997. 27:1506–1514.
Article
18. Dörfel D, Appel S, Grünebach F, Weck MM, Müller MR, Heine A, et al. Processing and presentation of HLA class I and II epitopes by dendritic cells after transfection with in vitro-transcribed MUC1 RNA. Blood. 2005. 105:3199–3205.
Article
19. Nimmerjahn F, Milosevic S, Behrends U, Jaffee EM, Pardoll DM, Bornkamm GW, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted presentation of a cytosolic antigen by autophagy. Eur J Immunol. 2003. 33:1250–1259.
Article
20. Paludan C, Schmid D, Landthaler M, Vockerodt M, Kube D, Tuschl T, et al. Endogenous MHC class II processing of a viral nuclear antigen after autophagy. Science. 2005. 307:593–596.
Article
21. Schmid D, Pypaert M, Münz C. Antigen-loading compartments for major histocompatibility complex class II molecules continuously receive input from autophagosomes. Immunity. 2007. 26:79–92.
Article
22. Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002. 20:197–216.
Article
23. Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2004. 5:987–995.
Article
24. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004. 4:499–511.
Article
25. Saitoh T, Akira S. Regulation of innate immune responses by autophagy-related proteins. J Cell Biol. 2010. 189:925–935.
Article
26. Xu Y, Jagannath C, Liu XD, Sharafkhaneh A, Kolodziejska KE, Eissa NT. Toll-like receptor 4 is a sensor for autophagy associated with innate immunity. Immunity. 2007. 27:135–144.
Article
27. Saitoh T, Fujita N, Jang MH, Uematsu S, Yang BG, Satoh T, et al. Loss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1beta production. Nature. 2008. 456:264–268.
Article
28. Delgado MA, Elmaoued RA, Davis AS, Kyei G, Deretic V. Toll-like receptors control autophagy. EMBO J. 2008. 27:1110–1121.
Article
29. Delgado MA, Deretic V. Toll-like receptors in control of immunological autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2009. 16:976–983.
Article
30. Sanjuan MA, Dillon CP, Tait SW, Moshiach S, Dorsey F, Connell S, et al. Toll-like receptor signalling in macrophages links the audetection tophagy pathway to phagocytosis. Nature. 2007. 450:1253–1257.
Article
31. Lee HK, Lund JM, Ramanathan B, Mizushima N, Iwasaki A. Autophagy-dependent viral recognition by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Science. 2007. 315:1398–1401.
Article
32. Barton GM. Viral recognition by Toll-like receptors. Semin Immunol. 2007. 19:33–40.
Article
33. Lee HK, Iwasaki A. Autophagy and antiviral immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008. 20:23–29.
Article
34. Inohara , Chamaillard , McDonald C, Nuñez G. NOD-LRR proteins: role in host-microbial interactions and inflammatory disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005. 74:355–383.
Article
35. Martinon F, Tschopp J. NLRs join TLRs as innate sensors of pathogens. Trends Immunol. 2005. 26:447–454.
Article
36. Lee MS, Kim YJ. Signaling pathways downstream of pattern-recognition receptors and their cross talk. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007. 76:447–480.
Article
37. Cooney R, Baker J, Brain O, Danis B, Pichulik T, Allan P, et al. NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat Med. 2010. 16:90–97.
Article
38. Travassos LH, Carneiro LA, Ramjeet M, Hussey S, Kim YG, Magalhães JG, et al. Nod1 and Nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting ATG16L1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat Immunol. 2010. 11:55–62.
Article
39. Yoneyama M, Kikuchi M, Natsukawa T, Shinobu N, Imaizumi T, Miyagishi M, et al. The RNA helicase RIG-I has an essential function in double-stranded RNA-induced innate antiviral responses. Nat Immunol. 2004. 5:730–737.
Article
40. Yoneyama M, Kikuchi M, Matsumoto K, Imaizumi T, Miyagishi M, Taira K, et al. Shared and unique functions of the DExD/H-box helicases RIG-I, MDA5, and LGP2 in antiviral innate immunity. J Immunol. 2005. 175:2851–2858.
Article
41. Foy E, Li K, Sumpter R Jr, Loo YM, Johnson CL, Wang C, et al. Control of antiviral defenses through hepatitis C virus disruption of retinoic acid-inducible gene-I signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005. 102:2986–2991.
Article
42. Jounai N, Takeshita F, Kobiyama K, Sawano A, Miyawaki A, Xin KQ, et al. The Atg5 Atg12 conjugate associates with innate antiviral immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. 104:14050–14055.
Article
43. Tal MC, Sasai M, Lee HK, Yordy B, Shadel GS, Iwasaki A. Absence of autophagy results in reactive oxygen species-dependent amplification of RLR signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009. 106:2770–2775.
Article
44. Charrel-Dennis M, Latz E, Halmen KA, Trieu-Cuot P, Fitzgerald KA, Kasper DL, et al. TLR-independent type I interferon induction in response to an extracellular bacterial pathogen via intracellular recognition of its DNA. Cell Host Microbe. 2008. 4:543–554.
Article
45. Stetson DB, Medzhitov R. Recognition of cytosolic DNA activates an IRF3-dependent innate immune response. Immunity. 2006. 24:93–103.
Article
46. Ishikawa H, Barber GN. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature. 2008. 455:674–678.
Article
47. Jin L, Waterman PM, Jonscher KR, Short CM, Reisdorph NA, Cambier JC. MPYS, a novel membrane tetraspanner, is associated with major histocompatibility complex class II and mediates transduction of apoptotic signals. Mol Cell Biol. 2008. 28:5014–5026.
Article
48. Sun W, Li Y, Chen L, Chen H, You F, Zhou X, et al. ERIS, an endoplasmic reticulum IFN stimulator, activates innate immune signaling through dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009. 106:8653–8658.
Article
49. Zhong B, Yang Y, Li S, Wang YY, Li Y, Diao F, et al. The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. Immunity. 2008. 29:538–550.
Article
50. Saitoh T, Fujita N, Hayashi T, Takahara K, Satoh T, Lee H, et al. Atg9a controls dsDNA-driven dynamic translocation of STING and the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009. 106:20842–20846.
Article
51. Münz C. Antigen processing by macroautophagy for MHC presentation. Front Immunol. 2011. 2:42.
Article
52. Münz C. Enhancing immunity through autophagy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009. 27:423–449.
Article
53. Sijts EJ, Kloetzel PM. The role of the proteasome in the generation of MHC class I ligands and immune responses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011. 68:1491–1502.
Article
54. van den Hoorn T, Paul P, Jongsma ML, Neefjes J. Routes to manipulate MHC class II antigen presentation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011. 23:88–95.
Article
55. Marrack P, Ignatowicz L, Kappler JW, Boymel J, Freed JH. Comparison of peptides bound to spleen and thymus class II. J Exp Med. 1993. 178:2173–2183.
Article
56. Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP, Bachor OA, Stevanović S. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics. 1999. 50:213–219.
Article
57. Muntasell A, Carrascal M, Serradell L, Veelen Pv P, Verreck F, Koning F, et al. HLA-DR4 molecules in neuroendocrine epithelial cells associate to a heterogeneous repertoire of cytoplasmic and surface self peptides. J Immunol. 2002. 169:5052–5060.
Article
58. Lee HK, Mattei LM, Steinberg BE, Alberts P, Lee YH, Chervonsky A, et al. In vivo requirement for Atg5 in antigen presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity. 2010. 32:227–239.
Article
59. Blanchet FP, Moris A, Nikolic DS, Lehmann M, Cardinaud S, Stalder R, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 inhibition of immunoamphisomes in dendritic cells impairs early innate and adaptive immune responses. Immunity. 2010. 32:654–669.
Article
60. Rosenfeldt MT, Ryan KM. The role of autophagy in tumour development and cancer therapy. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009. 11:e36.
Article
61. Levine B. Cell biology: autophagy and cancer. Nature. 2007. 446:745–747.
62. Mathew R, Karantza-Wadsworth V, White E. Role of autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007. 7:961–967.
Article
63. Wilkinson S, Ryan KM. Autophagy: an adaptable modifier of tumourigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010. 20:57–64.
Article
64. Pua HH, Dzhagalov I, Chuck M, Mizushima N, He YW. A critical role for the autophagy gene Atg5 in T cell survival and proliferation. J Exp Med. 2007. 204:25–31.
Article
65. Alirezaei M, Fox HS, Flynn CT, Moore CS, Hebb AL, Frausto RF, et al. Elevated ATG5 expression in autoimmune demyelination and multiple sclerosis. Autophagy. 2009. 5:152–158.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr