1. Lim TH, Hong MK, Lee JS, et al. Novel application of breath-hold turbo spin-echo T2 MRI for detection of acute myocardial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997. 7:996–1001.
2. Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am J Cardiol. 1983. 52:184–188.
3. Choi SI, Jiang CZ, Lim KH, et al. Application of breath-hold T2-weighted, first-pass perfusion and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging for assessment of myocardial viability in a pig model. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000. 11:476–480.
4. Pislaru SV, Ni Y, Pislaru C, et al. Noninvasive measurements of infarct size after thrombolysis with a necrosis-avid MRI contrast agent. Circulation. 1999. 99:690–696.
5. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1993. 29:485–497.
6. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Arai M, et al. Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation. 1995. 92:1902–1910.
7. Saeed M, Wendland MF, Matusi T, Higgins CB. Reperfused myocardial infarctions on T1- and susceptibility-enhanced MRI: evidence for loss of compartmentalization of contrast media. Magn Reson Med. 1994. 31:31–39.
8. Lim TH, Lee JG, Lee TK, Mun CW. Comparison of gadolinium polylysine and gadopentetate in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in cats. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1995. 33:59–65.
9. Choi SI, Choi SH, Kim ST, et al. Irreversibly damaged myocardium at MR imaging with a necrotic tissue-specific contrast agent in a cat model. Radiology. 2000. 215:863–868.
10. Saeed M, Bremerich J, Wendland MF, Wyttenbach R, Weinmann HJ, Higgins CB. Reperfused myocardial infarction as seen with use of necrosis-specific versus standard extracellular MR contrast media in rats. Radiology. 1999. 213:247–257.
11. Rogers WJ, Kramer CM, Geskin G, et al. Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999. 99:744–750.
12. Stillman AE, Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M. Myocardial viability. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999. 37:361–378.
13. Lim T-H, Choi SI. MRI of myocardial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999. 10:686–693.
14. Ambrosio G, Weisman HF, Mannisi JA, Becker LC. Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow. Circulation. 1989. 80:1846–1861.
15. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the 'no-reflow' phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996. 93:223–228.
16. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998. 97:765–772.
17. Kroft LJM, de Roos A. Blood pool contrast agents for cardiovascular MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999. 10:395–403.
18. Ni Y, Marchal G, Yu J, et al. Localization of metalloporphyrin-induced "specific" enhancement in experimental liver tumors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, microangiographic, and histologic findings. Acad Radiol. 1995. 2:687–699.
19. Marchal G, Ni Y, Herijgers P, et al. Paramagnetic metalloporphyrins: infarct-avid contrast agents for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by MRI. Eur Radiol. 1996. 6:2–8.