Korean J Radiol.  2002 Dec;3(4):235-239. 10.3348/kjr.2002.3.4.235.

The Significance of Perfusion Defect at Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging in a Cat Model of Acute Reperfused Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea. thlim@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To determine whether the size of a perfusion defect seen at myocardial perfusion MR imaging represents the extent of irreversibly damaged myocardium in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In nine cats, reperfused myocardial infarction was induced by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 90 minutes and subsequent reperfusion for 90 minutes. At single-slice myocardial perfusion MR imaging at the midventricular level using a turbo-FLASH sequence, 60 short-axis images were sequentially obtained with every heart beat after bolus injection of gadomer-17. The size of the perfusion defect was measured and compared with both the corresponding unstained area seen at triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining and the hyperenhanced area seen at gadophrin-2-enhanced MR imaging performed in the same cat six hours after myocardial perfusion MR imaging. RESULTS: The sizes of perfusion defects seen at gadomer-17-enhanced perfusion MR imaging, unstained areas at TTC staining, and hyperenhanced areas at gadophrin-2-enhanced MR imaging were 20.4+/-4.3%, 29.0+/-9.7%, and 30.7+/-10.6% of the left ventricular myocardium, respectively. The perfusion defects seen at myocardial perfusion MR imaging were significantly smaller than the unstained areas at TTC staining and hyperenhanced areas at gadophrin-2-enhanced MR imaging (p < .01). The sizes of both the perfusion defect at myocardial perfusion MR imaging and the hyperenhanced area at gadophrin-2- enhanced MR imaging correlated well with the sizes of unstained areas at TTC staining (r = .64, p = .062 and r = .70, p = .035, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this cat model, the perfusion defect revealed by myocardial perfusion MR imaging underestimated the true size of acute reperfused myocardial infarction. The defect may represent a more severely damaged area of infarction and probably has prognostic significance.

Keyword

Coronary vessels, stenosis or obstruction; Heart, experimental studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies; Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast agents; Myocardium, infarction; Myocardium, MR

MeSH Terms

Animal
Cats
Contrast Media
Gadolinium
Gadolinium DTPA/diagnostic use
*Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mesoporphyrins/diagnostic use
Metalloporphyrins/diagnostic use
Myocardial Infarction/*pathology/therapy
*Myocardial Reperfusion
Myocardium/pathology
Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Myocardial perfusion MR image and its time-signal intensity curves derived from the left ventricular blood pool, perfusion defect, and normal myocardium. A. Short-axis myocardial perfusion MR image obtained at the left midventricular level shows a perfusion defect at its anterior wall. To obtain time-signal intensity curves, regions of interest were placed in the left ventricular cavity (V), perfusion defect (P), and normal myocardium (N). B. Time-signal intensity curve obtained from the left ventricular blood pool of a representative case shows an initial, steep increase in signal intensity and then a plateau, according to the first pass of contrast agent. C. Time-signal intensity curve obtained from both the perfusion defect and normal myocardium of a representative case demonstrates typical myocardial enhancement for each region. The curve derived from normal myocardium shows a rapid increase and decrease in signal intensity; in contrast, that derived from the perfusion defect shows a slow but steady increase in signal intensity due to disturbed wash-out of contrast agent.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of the size of perfusion defects at myocardial perfusion MR imaging (20.4 ± 4.3% of the area of the left ventricular myocardium [LVM]), hyperenhanced areas at gadophrin-2-enhanced MR imaging (30.7 ± 10.6%), and unstained areas at TTC staining (*) (29.0 ± 9.7%). The first mentioned was significantly smaller than the second and last (p < .01).

  • Fig. 3 Correlation between the sizes of abnormal areas at MR (myocardial perfusion and gadophrin-2-enhanced) imaging and true infarct sizes at TTC staining. Spearman's correlation coefficients (r) were 0.64 (A) between myocardial perfusion MR imaging and TTC staining and 0.70 (B) between gadophrin-2-enhanced MR imaging and TTC staining.


Reference

1. Lim TH, Hong MK, Lee JS, et al. Novel application of breath-hold turbo spin-echo T2 MRI for detection of acute myocardial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997. 7:996–1001.
2. Higgins CB, Herfkens R, Lipton MJ, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of acute myocardial infarction in dogs: alterations in magnetic relaxation times. Am J Cardiol. 1983. 52:184–188.
3. Choi SI, Jiang CZ, Lim KH, et al. Application of breath-hold T2-weighted, first-pass perfusion and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging for assessment of myocardial viability in a pig model. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000. 11:476–480.
4. Pislaru SV, Ni Y, Pislaru C, et al. Noninvasive measurements of infarct size after thrombolysis with a necrosis-avid MRI contrast agent. Circulation. 1999. 99:690–696.
5. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1993. 29:485–497.
6. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Arai M, et al. Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation. 1995. 92:1902–1910.
7. Saeed M, Wendland MF, Matusi T, Higgins CB. Reperfused myocardial infarctions on T1- and susceptibility-enhanced MRI: evidence for loss of compartmentalization of contrast media. Magn Reson Med. 1994. 31:31–39.
8. Lim TH, Lee JG, Lee TK, Mun CW. Comparison of gadolinium polylysine and gadopentetate in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in cats. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1995. 33:59–65.
9. Choi SI, Choi SH, Kim ST, et al. Irreversibly damaged myocardium at MR imaging with a necrotic tissue-specific contrast agent in a cat model. Radiology. 2000. 215:863–868.
10. Saeed M, Bremerich J, Wendland MF, Wyttenbach R, Weinmann HJ, Higgins CB. Reperfused myocardial infarction as seen with use of necrosis-specific versus standard extracellular MR contrast media in rats. Radiology. 1999. 213:247–257.
11. Rogers WJ, Kramer CM, Geskin G, et al. Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999. 99:744–750.
12. Stillman AE, Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M. Myocardial viability. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999. 37:361–378.
13. Lim T-H, Choi SI. MRI of myocardial infarction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999. 10:686–693.
14. Ambrosio G, Weisman HF, Mannisi JA, Becker LC. Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow. Circulation. 1989. 80:1846–1861.
15. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the 'no-reflow' phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996. 93:223–228.
16. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998. 97:765–772.
17. Kroft LJM, de Roos A. Blood pool contrast agents for cardiovascular MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999. 10:395–403.
18. Ni Y, Marchal G, Yu J, et al. Localization of metalloporphyrin-induced "specific" enhancement in experimental liver tumors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, microangiographic, and histologic findings. Acad Radiol. 1995. 2:687–699.
19. Marchal G, Ni Y, Herijgers P, et al. Paramagnetic metalloporphyrins: infarct-avid contrast agents for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by MRI. Eur Radiol. 1996. 6:2–8.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr