Korean J Radiol.  2003 Dec;4(4):211-216. 10.3348/kjr.2003.4.4.211.

Automated Lung Nodule Detection at Low-Dose CT: Preliminary Experience

• Goo JM
• Lee JW
• Lee HJ
• Kim S
• Kim JH
• Im JG

• KMID: 1111249
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2003.4.4.211

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To determine the usefulness of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the automated detection of lung nodules at low-dose CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS : A CAD system developed for detecting lung nodules was used to process the data provided by 50 consecutive low-dose CT scans. The results of an initial report, a second look review by two chest radiologists, and those obtained by the CAD system were compared, and by reviewing all of these, a gold standard was established. RESULTS : By applying the gold standard, a total of 52 nodules were identified (26 with a diameter < or =5 mm; 26 with a diameter > 5 mm). Compared to an initial report, four additional nodules were detected by the CAD system. Three of these, identified only at CAD, formed part of the data used to derive the gold standard. For the detection of nodules > 5 mm in diameter, sensitivity was 77% for the initial report, 88% for the second look review, and 65% for the CAD system. There were 8.0+/-5.2 false-positive CAD results per CT study. CONCLUSION : These preliminary results indicate that a CAD system may improve the detection of pulmonary nodules at low-dose CT.

Keyword

Lung, nodule; Lung, CT; Computer-aided diagnosis

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*methods/*standards
Human
Lung Neoplasms/classification/*radiography
Mass Screening/methods
Middle Aged
Radiation Dosage
Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods/*standards

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 A 6-mm nodule in the left lower lobe (arrow) adjacent to the diaphragm was detected only by the CAD system and missed by radiologists, though it was visible in retrospect.

• 

  Fig. 2 A 7-mm nodule in the left upper lobe (arrow) was described as a fibrotic lesion in the initial report, but was identified and categorized as a nodule at both second look review and by the CAD system.

• 

  Fig. 3 A 6-mm nodule in the left upper lobe (arrow) was detected only during the second look review.

• 

  Fig. 4 A 14-mm nodule in the right lower lobe (arrow) was identified by radiologists but not detected by the CAD system. At follow-up CT performed six months later (not shown), it was not visible.

Reference

1. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet. 1999. 354:99–105.

2. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology. 2002. 222:773–781.

3. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002. 165:508–513.

4. Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M, et al. Detection failures in spiral CT screening for lung cancer: analysis of CT findings. Radiology. 1999. 212:61–66.

5. Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG III, Doi K. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology. 2002. 225:673–683.

6. Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, Armato SG III. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001. 20:1205–1208.

7. Giger ML, Bae KT, MacMahon H. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images. Invest Radiol. 1994. 29:459–465.

8. Kanazawa K, Kawata Y, Niki N, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for pulmonary nodules based on helical CT images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1998. 22:157–167.

9. Armato SG III, Giger ML, MacMahon H. Automated detection of lung nodules on CT scans: preliminary results. Med Phys. 2001. 28:1552–1561.

10. Ko JP, Betke M. Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time-preliminary experience. Radiology. 2001. 218:267–273.

11. Lee Y, Hara T, Fujita H, et al. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001. 20:595–604.

12. Gurcan MN, Sahiner B, Petrick N, et al. Lung nodule detection on thoracic computed tomography images: preliminary evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Med Phys. 2002. 29:2552–2558.

13. Wormanns D, Fiebich M, Saidi M, Diederich S, Heindel W. Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: clinical application of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Eur Radiol. 2002. 12:1052–1057.

14. Brown MS, Goldin JG, Suh RD, McNitt-Gray MF, Sayre JW, Aberle DR. Lung micronodules: automated method for detection at thin-section CT: initial experience. Radiology. 2003. 226:256–262.

15. Armato SG III, Li F, Giger ML, MacMahon H, Sone S, Doi K. Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology. 2002. 225:685–692.

16. Wormanns D, Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Heindel W. Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size. Eur Radiol. 2000. 10:710–713.