Korean J Radiol.  2011 Dec;12(6):651-661. 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.6.651.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Exploring the Motor Networks and Clinical Applications

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea. slee@yuhs.ac

Abstract

With the advances in diffusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been applied to a number of neurological conditions because DTI can demonstrate microstructures of the brain that are not assessable with conventional MR imaging. Tractography based on DTI offers gross visualization of the white matter fiber architecture in the human brain in vivo. Degradation of restrictive barriers and disruption of the cytoarchitecture result in changes in the diffusion of water molecules in various pathological conditions, and these conditions can also be assessed with DTI. Yet many factors may influence the ability to apply DTI clinically, so these techniques have to be used with a cautious hand.

Keyword

Diffusion tensor imaging; Tractography; Diffusion weighted imaging

MeSH Terms

Anisotropy
Brain/anatomy & histology/surgery
Brain Diseases/*diagnosis/surgery
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
*Diffusion Tensor Imaging/methods
Humans
Motor Cortex/*anatomy & histology
Neural Pathways/*anatomy & histology
Pyramidal Tracts/anatomy & histology

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Calculation of fractional anisotropy. Largest vector of diffusion ellipsoid is eigenvector 1 and its value is λ1. Shortest one is λ3 and remainder is λ2. Fractional anisotropy is calculated by each of eigenvalues. Fractional anisotropy varies from 0 (infinite isotropy) to 1 (infinite anisotropy).

  • Fig. 2 Gray and color scale fractional anisotropy maps. High signal on fractional anisotropy map indicates higher anisotropy such as corpus callosum and internal capsule. On color scale fractional anisotropy map, red fibers represent transverse direction, green represents anterior to posterior direction and blue represents head to foot direction. ALIC = anterior limb of internal capsule, CC = corpus callosum, CR = corona radiata, CST = corticospinal tract, EC = external capsule, MCP = middle cerebellar peduncle, MLF = medial longitudinal fasciculus, OR = optic radiation, PLIC = posterior limb of internal capsule, PTR = posterior thalamic radiation, SLF = superior longitudinal fasciculus.

  • Fig. 3 Principle of streamline fiber tracking. From starting point, automatic 3-D fiber tracking is done by connecting voxel to voxel with pre-defined threshold values of fractional anisotropy (FA) and trajectory angle. Fiber tracking terminates when fractional anisotropy is lower and trajectory angle exceeds threshold values. For clinical fiber tracking, fractional anisotropy of 0.1-0.2 and trajectory angle of 30-45 degrees are usually used.

  • Fig. 4 Probabilistic map of left corticospinal tract. Yellow area has higher probability of connection such as longitudinal pontine fibers and corticospinal tract that innervates the lower extremities. There can be some connectivity to ipsilateral temporal lobe, contralateral hemisphere or basal ganglia, although probability is very low. Overall shape is similar to streamline tractography in next figure.

  • Fig. 5 Streamline tractography of corticospinal tract. Three regions of interests are placed at longitudinal pontine fibers, mid-1/3 of posterior limb of internal capsule and primary sensory-motor cortex. These anatomic landmarks are preferred because they are easily localized and they are reliable pathways of corticospinal tract.

  • Fig. 6 Diffusion tensor imaging shows 4 different tracts intermingled in centrum semiovale. Cingular fibers (Cng) runs antero-posteriorly. CC = corpus callosum, CR = corona radiata, SLF = superior longitudinal fasciculus.

  • Fig. 7 Arcuate fasciculus (superior longitudinal fasciculus) connecting Broca's area and Wernicke's area. Right-left asymmetry is reported and usually dominant hemisphere has larger volume of arcuate fasciculus.

  • Fig. 8 Dentato-rubro-thalamo-cortical connection, which is major ascending fiber system from cerebellum to cerebral cortex. Region of interests are placed in each of anatomic locations (A = primary and premotor, B = thalamus, C = red nucleus, D = superior cerebellar peduncle).

  • Fig. 9 28-year-old female with anaplastic astrocytoma. Tractography clearly visualizes that mass is located at center of corticospinal tract.

  • Fig. 10 14-year-old male with intractable seizure and previous right frontal lobectomy status. Selective callosotomy was planned because patient complained of repeated seizure attacks. Yellow fibers indicate commissural fibers between bilateral sensory-motor cortex, which were preserved after callosotomy, while other callosal fibers were disconnected (thick arrow at frontal fibers and thin arrows at splenial fibers).

  • Fig. 11 60-year-old male with left middle cerebral artery infarct. Initial diffusion weighted MRI shows acute infarct affecting left middle cerebral artery territory, including left corona radiate at level of centrum semiovale. Internal capsule at basal ganglia level is not affected. Initial tractography shows intact corticospinal tract, yet follow up scan 7 days after stroke reveals early injury to corticospinal tract, i.e., early start of Wallerian degeneration after major infarct.

  • Fig. 12 8-year-old male with intractable seizure. Conventional spin-echo and inversion recovery (IR) MRI shows no definite abnormality of frontal cortex. PET demonstrates decreased metabolism at right frontal cortex (thick arrow). MR spectroscopy describes increased choline level in right frontal cortex. Tractography of both hemispheres reveals decreased subcortical fiber connectivity in left frontal cortex (thin arrows). In this case, tractography was more sensitive than other conventional MRI modalities and it can be compared with PET or MR spectroscopy.


Cited by  1 articles

Characteristics of Corticospinal Tract Area According to Pontine Level
Jeong Pyo Seo, Sung Ho Jang
Yonsei Med J. 2013;54(3):785-787.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.785.


Reference

1. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986. 161:401–407.
2. Mori S, Oishi K, Faria AV. White matter atlases based on diffusion tensor imaging. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009. 22:362–369.
3. Berman J. Diffusion MR tractography as a tool for surgical planning. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009. 17:205–214.
4. Pizzini FB, Polonara G, Mascioli G, Beltramello A, Foroni R, Paggi A, et al. Diffusion tensor tracking of callosal fibers several years after callosotomy. Brain Res. 2010. 1312:10–17.
5. Yang Q, Tress BM, Barber PA, Desmond PM, Darby DG, Gerraty RP, et al. Serial study of apparent diffusion coefficient and anisotropy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 1999. 30:2382–2390.
6. Lee SK, Kim DI, Kim J, Kim DJ, Kim HD, Kim DS, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: a new method of describing aberrant fiber connections in developmental CNS anomalies. Radiographics. 2005. 25:53–65. discussion 66-58.
7. Zhang Y, Schuff N, Jahng GH, Bayne W, Mori S, Schad L, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of cingulum fibers in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007. 68:13–19.
8. Kubicki M, Westin CF, Maier SE, Mamata H, Frumin M, Ersner-Hershfield H, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and its application to neuropsychiatric disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2002. 10:324–336.
9. Chenevert TL, Brunberg JA, Pipe JG. Anisotropic diffusion in human white matter: demonstration with MR techniques in vivo. Radiology. 1990. 177:401–405.
10. Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology. 1996. 201:637–648.
11. Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999. 42:515–525.
12. Papadakis NG, Xing D, Huang CL, Hall LD, Carpenter TA. A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson. 1999. 137:67–82.
13. Hasan KM, Parker DL, Alexander AL. Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001. 13:769–780.
14. Jones DK. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med. 2004. 51:807–815.
15. Turner R, Le Bihan D, Chesnick AS. Echo-planar imaging of diffusion and perfusion. Magn Reson Med. 1991. 19:247–253.
16. Anderson AW, Gore JC. Analysis and correction of motion artifacts in diffusion weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1994. 32:379–387.
17. Ordidge RJ, Helpern JA, Qing ZX, Knight RA, Nagesh V. Correction of motional artifacts in diffusion-weighted MR images using navigator echoes. Magn Reson Imaging. 1994. 12:455–460.
18. Papadakis NG, Martin KM, Mustafa MH, Wilkinson ID, Griffiths PD, Huang CL, et al. Study of the effect of CSF suppression on white matter diffusion anisotropy mapping of healthy human brain. Magn Reson Med. 2002. 48:394–398.
19. Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, Ito H, Nakamura H, Yuen S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2003. 227:295–301.
20. Okada T, Miki Y, Fushimi Y, Hanakawa T, Kanagaki M, Yamamoto A, et al. Diffusion-tensor fiber tractography: intraindividual comparison of 3.0-T and 1.5-T MR imaging. Radiology. 2006. 238:668–678.
21. Nagae-Poetscher LM, Jiang H, Wakana S, Golay X, van Zijl PC, Mori S. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of the brain stem at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004. 25:1325–1330.
22. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, Clark CA, Pappata S, Molko N, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001. 13:534–546.
23. Douek P, Turner R, Pekar J, Patronas N, Le Bihan D. MR color mapping of myelin fiber orientation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991. 15:923–929.
24. Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1999. 45:265–269.
25. Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S, et al. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2003. 50:1077–1088.
26. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage. 2007. 34:144–155.
27. Oishi K, Zilles K, Amunts K, Faria A, Jiang H, Li X, et al. Human brain white matter atlas: identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter. Neuroimage. 2008. 43:447–457.
28. Lee JS, Han MK, Kim SH, Kwon OK, Kim JH. Fiber tracking by diffusion tensor imaging in corticospinal tract stroke: Topographical correlation with clinical symptoms. Neuroimage. 2005. 26:771–776.
29. Geyer S, Matelli M, Luppino G, Zilles K. Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2000. 202:443–474.
30. Guye M, Parker GJ, Symms M, Boulby P, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Salek-Haddadi A, et al. Combined functional MRI and tractography to demonstrate the connectivity of the human primary motor cortex in vivo. Neuroimage. 2003. 19:1349–1360.
31. Laundre BJ, Jellison BJ, Badie B, Alexander AL, Field AS. Diffusion tensor imaging of the corticospinal tract before and after mass resection as correlated with clinical motor findings: preliminary data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005. 26:791–796.
32. Lazar M, Alexander AL, Thottakara PJ, Badie B, Field AS. White matter reorganization after surgical resection of brain tumors and vascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006. 27:1258–1271.
33. Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, Cha S. Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003. 24:937–941.
34. Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, Law M, Zagzag D, Grossman RI. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema: introduction of the tumor infiltration index. Radiology. 2004. 232:221–228.
35. Powell HW, Parker GJ, Alexander DC, Symms MR, Boulby PA, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al. MR tractography predicts visual field defects following temporal lobe resection. Neurology. 2005. 65:596–599.
36. Jea A, Vachhrajani S, Widjaja E, Nilsson D, Raybaud C, Shroff M, et al. Corpus callosotomy in children and the disconnection syndromes: a review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008. 24:685–692.
37. Klatzo I. Pathophysiological aspects of brain edema. Acta Neuropathol. 1987. 72:236–239.
38. Davis D, Ulatowski J, Eleff S, Izuta M, Mori S, Shungu D, et al. Rapid monitoring of changes in water diffusion coefficients during reversible ischemia in cat and rat brain. Magn Reson Med. 1994. 31:454–460.
39. Carano RA, Li F, Irie K, Helmer KG, Silva MD, Fisher M, et al. Multispectral analysis of the temporal evolution of cerebral ischemia in the rat brain. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000. 12:842–858.
40. Nelles M, Gieseke J, Flacke S, Lachenmayer L, Schild HH, Urbach H. Diffusion tensor pyramidal tractography in patients with anterior choroidal artery infarcts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008. 29:488–493.
41. Hosomi A, Nagakane Y, Yamada K, Kuriyama N, Mizuno T, Nishimura T, et al. Assessment of arcuate fasciculus with diffusion-tensor tractography may predict the prognosis of aphasia in patients with left middle cerebral artery infarcts. Neuroradiology. 2009. 51:549–555.
42. McKinstry RC, Mathur A, Miller JH, Ozcan A, Snyder AZ, Schefft GL, et al. Radial organization of developing preterm human cerebral cortex revealed by non-invasive water diffusion anisotropy MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2002. 12:1237–1243.
43. Eriksson SH, Symms MR, Rugg-Gunn FJ, Boulby PA, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Barker GJ, et al. Exploring white matter tracts in band heterotopia using diffusion tractography. Ann Neurol. 2002. 52:327–334.
44. Hoon AH Jr, Lawrie WT Jr, Melhem ER, Reinhardt EM, Van Zijl PC, Solaiyappan M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of periventricular leukomalacia shows affected sensory cortex white matter pathways. Neurology. 2002. 59:752–756.
45. Kapeller P, Schmidt R, Fazekas F. Qualitative MRI: evidence of usual aging in the brain. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004. 15:343–347.
46. Salat DH, Tuch DS, Greve DN, van der Kouwe AJ, Hevelone ND, Zaleta AK, et al. Age-related alterations in white matter microstructure measured by diffusion tensor imaging. Neurobiol Aging. 2005. 26:1215–1227.
47. Charlton RA, Barrick TR, McIntyre DJ, Shen Y, O'Sullivan M, Howe FA, et al. White matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging correlates with age-related cognitive decline. Neurology. 2006. 66:217–222.
48. Medina D, DeToledo-Morrell L, Urresta F, Gabrieli JD, Moseley M, Fleischman D, et al. White matter changes in mild cognitive impairment and AD: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurobiol Aging. 2006. 27:663–672.
49. Taoka T, Iwasaki S, Sakamoto M, Nakagawa H, Fukusumi A, Myochin K, et al. Diffusion anisotropy and diffusivity of white matter tracts within the temporal stem in Alzheimer disease: evaluation of the "tract of interest" by diffusion tensor tractography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006. 27:1040–1045.
50. Matsuo K, Mizuno T, Yamada K, Akazawa K, Kasai T, Kondo M, et al. Cerebral white matter damage in frontotemporal dementia assessed by diffusion tensor tractography. Neuroradiology. 2008. 50:605–611.
51. Ganguli M, Dodge HH, Shen C, DeKosky ST. Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study. Neurology. 2004. 63:115–121.
52. Vaillancourt DE, Spraker MB, Prodoehl J, Abraham I, Corcos DM, Zhou XJ, et al. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging in the substantia nigra of de novo Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2009. 72:1378–1384.
53. Kubicki M, McCarley R, Westin CF, Park HJ, Maier S, Kikinis R, et al. A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2007. 41:15–30.
54. Kyriakopoulos M, Bargiotas T, Barker GJ, Frangou S. Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2008. 23:255–273.
55. Kanaan RA, Kim JS, Kaufmann WE, Pearlson GD, Barker GJ, McGuire PK. Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2005. 58:921–929.
56. Scollan DF, Holmes A, Winslow R, Forder J. Histological validation of myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol. 1998. 275:H2308–H2318.
57. Lin CP, Tseng WY, Cheng HC, Chen JH. Validation of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance axonal fiber imaging with registered manganese-enhanced optic tracts. Neuroimage. 2001. 14:1035–1047.
58. Okada T, Mikuni N, Miki Y, Kikuta K, Urayama S, Hanakawa T, et al. Corticospinal tract localization: integration of diffusion-tensor tractography at 3-T MR imaging with intraoperative white matter stimulation mapping--preliminary results. Radiology. 2006. 240:849–857.
59. Hagmann P, Jonasson L, Maeder P, Thiran JP, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R. Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics. 2006. 26:Suppl 1. S205–S223.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr