- Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
-
Kim HS, Kim K, Ryoo SB, Seo JH, Kim SY, Park JW, Kim MA, Hong KS, Jeong CW, Song YS, FUSION Study Group
- KMID: 2160792
- J Gynecol Oncol.
- 2015 Apr;26(2):100-110.
- doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100
OBJECTIVE: Although nerve-sparing radical surgery (NSRS) is an emerging technique for reducing surgery-related dysfunctions, its efficacy is controversial in patients with cervical cancer. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare... -
- CITED
-
- Close
- SHARE
-
- Close
- Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial
-
Roh JW, Lee DO, Suh DH, Lim MC, Seo SS, Chung J, Lee S, Park SY
- KMID: 2160791
- J Gynecol Oncol.
- 2015 Apr;26(2):90-99.
- doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.90
OBJECTIVE: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) in preserving bladder function and its oncologic safety in the treatment of cervical... -
- CITED
-
- Close
- SHARE
-
- Close
