Skip Navigation
Skip to contents
Results by Year

View Wide

Filter

ARTICLE TYPE

more+
SELECT FILTER
 
Close

PUBLICATION DATE

6 results
Display

Large Retroperitoneal Hematoma and Lumbosacral Plexopathy Following Microsurgical Decompression via the Wiltse Paraspinal Approach: A Case Report

Suen TK, Lin GX, Jo HJ, Quillo-Olvera J, Kim JS

Paraspinal approaches are associated with fewer complications and better outcomes than midline approaches. However, most surgeons are not conversant with the surgical anatomy in these approaches, especially at the lumbosacral...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Endoscope-assisted Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion L5-S1 with Posterior Fixation with Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Plus Pedicle Screw for Treatment of Adjacent Segment Degeneration Disease: A Technical Note

Mahatthanatrakul A, Kotheeranurak V, Lin GX, Chung HJ, Kim JS

Adjacent segment disease (ASDis) is a common sequela after lumbar spinal fusion. Current surgical treatment for ASDis with instability is decompression and extended fusion which could be done by posterior,...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Do Obliquity and Position of the Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Influence the Degree of Indirect Decompression of Foraminal Stenosis?

Mahatthanatrakul A, Kotheeranurak V, Lin GX, Hur JW, Chung HJ, Lokanath YK, Pakdeenit B, Kim JS

Objective : Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a surgical technique that utilizes a large interbody cage to indirectly decompress neural elements. The position of the cage relative to the...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lin GX, He LR, Nan JN, Xu WB, Xiao K, Que Z, Jhang SW, Chen CM, Zhu MT, Rui G

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis

Kotheeranurak V, Jitpakdee K, Lewandrowski KU, Lin GX, Singhatanadgige W, Limthongkul W, Yingsakmongkol W, Kim JS, Liawrungrueang W

Objective: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between 2 motion preservation surgeries, cervical disc replacement (CDR) and posterior endoscopic cervical decompression (PECD), for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. Methods: Between February 2018 and...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
A 30-Year Worldwide Research Productivity of Scientific Publication in Full-Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Liu Y, Kotheeranurak V, Quillo-Olvera J, Facundo VI, Sharma S, Suvithayasiri S, Jitpakdee K, Lin GX, Mahatthanatrakul A, Jabri H, Khandge AV, Aher RB, Wu MH, Ho AWH, Wong NMR, Wing LS, Akbary K, Patel KK, Pakdeenit B, Chen KT, Lokanath YK, Jaiswal MS, Suen TK, Hasan GA, Sabal LA, Kim JS

Objective: The ever-growing number of articles related to full-endoscopic spine surgery published in the last few decades presents a challenge which is perplexing and time-consuming in identifying the current research...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close

Go to Top

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr