Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Sep;38(5):466-472. English. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.466
Choi MS , Lee K , Hong YJ , Song EY , Kim DS , Song J .
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. aeiea@snu.ac.kr
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonbuk National University College of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract

Background

Following discontinuation of the recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA), the only available supplementary test for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). However, the NAAT does not adequately detect past HCV. Consequently, it is hard to distinguish between past HCV infection and biological false positivity with an anti-HCV result alone. We assessed the diagnostic performance of two immunoassays: the ARCHITECT anti-HCV chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA; Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany) and the Access HCV Ab PLUS chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). We also explored an optimized algorithm to determine the anti-HCV results.

Methods

We tested 126,919 patients and 44,556 individuals who underwent a medical checkup. RIBA and NAAT were conducted for samples that tested anti-HCV-positive using CMIA and CIA. We assessed the optimal signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio in HCV-positive samples.

Results

In total, 1,035 blood samples tested anti-HCV-positive. Of these, RIBA was positive in 512, indeterminate in 160, and negative in 363 samples. One hundred sixty-five samples were NAAT-positive. Diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 96.7% and 52.1%, respectively, for CMIA, and 94.7% and 72.3%, respectively, for CIA. The optimal S/CO ratio was 5.2 for CMIA and 2.6 for CIA at 95% PPV. In total, 286 samples tested positive in CMIA and 444 in CIA, while 443 samples tested positive in both assays.

Conclusions

It is hard to determine anti-HCV positivity based on the S/CO ratio alone. However, this study elucidated the role of the S/CO ratio by using the NAAT and RIBA.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.