Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Clin Endosc. 2016 Nov;49(6):542-547. English. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.113
Cho YK , Moon JS , Han DS , Lee YC , Kim Y , Park BY , Chung IK , Kim JO , Im JP , Cha JM , Kim HG , Lee SK , Lee HL , Jang JY , Kim ES , Jung Y , Moon CM , .
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. moonjs2@unitel.co.kr
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In Korea, the nationwide gastric cancer screening program recommends biennial screening for individuals aged 40 years or older by way of either an upper gastrointestinal series or endoscopy. The national endoscopic quality assessment (QA) program began recommending endoscopy in medical institutions in 2009. We aimed to assess the effect, burden, and cost of the QA program from the viewpoint of medical institutions. METHODS: We surveyed the staff of institutional endoscopic units via e-mail. RESULTS: Staff members from 67 institutions replied. Most doctors were endoscopic specialists. They responded as to whether the QA program raised awareness for endoscopic quality (93%) or improved endoscopic practice (40%). The percentages of responders who reported improvements in the diagnosis of gastric cancer, the qualifications of endoscopists, the quality of facilities and equipment, endoscopic procedure, and endoscopic reprocessing were 69%, 60%, 66%, 82%, and 75%, respectively. Regarding reprocessing, many staff members reported that they had bought new automated endoscopic preprocessors (3%), used more disinfectants (34%), washed endoscopes longer (28%), reduced the number of endoscopies performed to adhere to reprocessing guidelines (9%), and created their own quality education programs (59%). Many responders said they felt that QA was associated with some degree of burden (48%), especially financial burden caused by purchasing new equipment. Reasonable quality standards (45%) and incentives (38%) were considered important to the success of the QA program. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic quality has improved after 5 years of the mandatory endoscopic QA program.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.