Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Restor Dent Endod. 2018 May;43(2):e22. English. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e22
Rocha Maia R , Oliveira D , D'Antonio T , Qian F , Skiff F .
Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA. rodrigo-maia@uiowa.edu
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Division of Biostatistics and Research Design, Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research and Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA.
Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate and compare light-transmittance in dental tissues and dental composite restorations using the incremental double-layer technique with varying layer thickness.

Materials and Methods

B1-colored natural teeth slabs were compared to dental restoration build-ups with A2D and B1E-colored nanofilled, supra-nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid composites. The enamel layer varied from 0.3, 0.5, or 1.2 mm thick, and the dentin layer was varied to provide a standardized 3.7 mm overall sample thickness (n = 10). All increments were light-cured to 16 J/cm2 with a multi-wave LED (Valo, Ultradent). Using a spectrophotometer, the samples were irradiated by an RGB laser beam. A voltmeter recorded the light output signal to calculate the light-transmittance through the specimens. The data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance followed by the post hoc Tukey's test (p = 0.05).

Results

Mean light-transmittance observed at thicker final layers of enamel were significantly lower than those observed at thinner final layers. Within 1.2 mm final enamel resin layer (FERL) thickness, all composites were similar to the dental tissues, with exception of the nanofilled composite. However, within 0.5 mm FERL thickness, only the supra-nanofilled composite showed no difference from the dental tissues. Within 0.3 mm FERL thickness, none of the composites were similar to the dental tissues.

Conclusions

The supra-nanofilled composite had the most similar light-transmittance pattern when compared to the natural teeth. However, for other composites, thicker FERL have a greater chance to match the light-transmittance of natural dental tissues.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.