Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Aug;41(3):189-195. English. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.189
Song YS , Choi Y , Lim MJ , Yu MK , Hong CU , Lee KW , Min KS .
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea. endomin@gmail.com
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, Iksan, Korea.
Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A variety of root canal sealers were recently launched to the market. This study evaluated physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and sealing ability of a newly launched resin-based sealer (Dia-Proseal, Diadent) compared to the existing root canal sealers (AHplus, Dentsply DeTrey and ADseal, Metabiomed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The physicochemical properties of the tested sealers including pH, solubility, dimensional change, and radiopacity were evaluated. Biocompatibility was measured using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. For microleakage test, single-rooted teeth were instrumented, and obturated with gutta-percha and one of the sealers (n = 10). After immersion in 1% methylene blue solution for 2 weeks, the specimens were split longitudinally. Then, the maximum length of staining was measured. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test (p = 0.05). RESULTS: Dia-Proseal showed the highest pH value among the tested sealers (p < 0.05). ADseal showed higher dimensional change compared to AHplus and Dia-Proseal (p < 0.05). The solubility values of AHplus and Dia-Proseal were similar, whereas ADseal had the lowest solubility value (p < 0.05). The flow values of sealer in increasing order were AHplus, DiaProseal, and ADseal (p < 0.05). The radiopacity of AHplus was higher than those of ADseal and Dia-Proseal (p < 0.05). The cell viability of the tested materials was statistically similar throughout the experimental period. There were no significant differences in microleakage values among the tested samples. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that Dia-Proseal has acceptable physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and sealing ability.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.