Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Sep;11(3):141-145. English. Review. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.3.141
Kushima R , Kim KM .
Clinical Laboratory Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kkmkys@skku.edu
Abstract

Although the biological potential of gastric epithelial dysplasia (GED) as a precursor of gastric cancer has never been in doubt, the classification of these lesions has been controversial and fraught with marked variations in approach to diagnosis across the world. The complexity of cyto-architectural features has been considered to be of paramount importance for the diagnosis of carcinoma in Japan, while breach of the basement membrane and invasion into the lamina propria has been considered the sine qua non of malignancy and hence a pre-requisite for the diagnosis of cancer in the West. In Korea, although the incidence of gastric cancer is similar to Japan, the diagnostic approach to GED or cancer seems to lie midway between Western and Japanese criteria. In this review, we will discuss the difference in the diagnosis of GED and cancer between two pathologists working in the comprehensive cancer center located in Japan and Korea, one of the most prevalent areas in the world for gastric cancer.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.