Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Korean Circ J. 2018 Jun;48(6):447-462. English. Review. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2018.0078
Al-Hijji M , El Sabbagh A , Holmes DR .
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. holmes.david@mayo.edu
Abstract

Revascularization of severe left main and multivessel coronary artery disease has been shown to improve survival in both stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. While revascularization with coronary artery bypass surgery for these disease entities carries class I recommendation in most current guidelines, recent trials has shown potential comparable survival and cardiovascular outcomes between percutaneous and surgical interventions in patients with less complex coronary anatomy. Despite the conflicting results observed in the most recent left main revascularization trials, Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (EXCEL) and Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization (NOBLE), both treatment strategies remain important for the management of left main disease (LMD) and multivessel disease (MVD) reflecting on the importance of heart team discussion. This review is focused on revascularization of LMD and MVD in patients who are not presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, encompassing the evidence from historic and contemporary trials which shaped up current practices. This review discusses the heart team approach to guide decision making, including special populations that are not represented in clinical trials.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.