Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Korean Circ J. 2014 Nov;44(6):423-428. English. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2014.44.6.423
Lee SY , Jang YH , Lee MY , Hwang J , Lee SH , Chon MK , Hwang SA , Kim JS , Park YH , Chun KJ , Kim JH .
Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Institute of Cancer Rehabilitation and Convalescence, Yoonsung Hospital, Cheongdo, Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea. junehongk@gmail.com
Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of commonly used contrast media (CM) on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Isolated rat hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of regional ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion. The following CM (1 mL/1 L Krebs-Henseleit buffer) were randomly perfused for 15 minutes beginning 5 minutes before reperfusion and ending 10 minutes after reperfusion: iohexol (n=8), iopromide (n=8), ioversol (n=8), iomeprol (n=8), iopamidol (n=7), ioxaglate (n=8), and iodixanol (n=7). The effects of a direct bolus injection of undiluted iohexol, iopromide, or ioxaglate (each n=6) via the aortic root immediately prior to reperfusion were also evaluated. The area of necrosis, expressed as the percentage of the area at risk (AN/AR), and cardiodynamic variables were measured. RESULTS: The AN/AR of the control and experimental groups in the order described in methods was 33.7+/-6.4%, 30.3+/-7.4%, 34.7+/-12.6%, 29.2+/-10.2%, 20.9+/-7.6%, 22.6+/-8.7%, 18.8+/-7.9%, and 19.9+/-11.4%, respectively. Groups that received iomeprol and ioxaglate exhibited significantly decreased AN/AR values compared to those of control hearts (p=0.042 and p=0.013). No significant differences in the AN/AR were observed between control hearts and the groups injected with a single bolus of CM. No significant hemodynamic changes were noted after reperfusion among the groups. CONCLUSION: The overall effects of the CM on coronary reperfusion were not deleterious, and better effects were noted in two CM groups. However, it is unclear whether this result was attributed to a specific physiochemical property of the CM.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.