Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Aug;41(4):659-666. English. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.659
Kim NS , Seo JH , Ko MH , Park SH , Kang SW , Won YH .
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea. wonyh@jbnu.ac.kr
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the respiratory muscle strength between patients with stable and acutely exacerbated (AE) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at various stages. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted on patients with COPD from March 2014 to May 2016. Patients were subdivided into COPD stages 1–4 according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines: mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. A rehabilitation physician reviewed their medical records and initial assessment, including spirometry, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), COPD Assessment Test, and modified Medical Research Council scale. We then compared the initial parameters in patients with a stable condition and those at AE status. RESULTS: The AE group (n=94) had significantly lower MIP (AE, 55.93±20.57; stable, 67.88±24.96; p=0.006) and MIP% (AE, 82.82±27.92; stable, 96.64±30.46; p=0.015) than the stable patient group (n=36). MIP, but not MEP, was proportional to disease severity in patients with AE and stable COPD. CONCLUSION: The strength of the inspiratory muscles may better reflect severity of disease when compared to that of expiratory muscles.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.