Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul;67(1):32-37. English. Original Article.
Jung KT , Kim SH , Lee HY , Jung JD , Yu BS , Lim KJ , So KY , Lee JY , An TH .
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

BACKGROUND: It has been known that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increases the vasoconstriction threshold by baroreceptor unloading. We compared the effect on the thermoregulatory responses according to anesthetic techniques between an inhalation anesthesia with desflurane and a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and reminfentanil when PEEP was applied in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. METHODS: Forty-six patients with a scheduled tympanoplasty were enrolled and the patients were divided in two study groups. Desflurane was used as an inhalation anesthetic in group 1 (n = 22), while TIVA with propofol and remifentanil was used in group 2 (n = 24). PEEP was applied by 5 cmH2O in both groups and an ambient temperature was maintained at 22-24degrees C during surgery. The core temperature and the difference of skin temperature between forearm and fingertip were monitored for about 180 minutes before and after the induction of general anesthesia. RESULTS: The final core temperature was significantly higher in group 2 (35.4 +/- 0.7degrees C) than in group 1 (34.9 +/- 0.5degrees C). Peripheral thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was found in 5 subjects (23%) in group 1 and in 21 subjects (88%) in group 2. The time taken for reaching the thermoregulatory vasoconstriction threshold was 151.4 +/- 19.7 minutes in group 1 and 88.9 +/- 14.4 minutes in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: When PEEP will be applied, anesthesia with TIVA may have more advantages in core temperature preservation than an inhalation anesthesia with desflurane.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.