Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2011 Sep;36(5):409-418. Korean. Original Article. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.5.409
Song BC , Cho YG , Lee MS .
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry, Gwangju, Korea. ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr
Department of Dental Hygiene, SeoYeong University, Gwangju, Korea.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (microSBS) and bonding interfaces of two-step total-etching and self-etching adhesive systems to three etch types of dentin either the acid etched, laser etched or laser and acid etched. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal dentinal surfaces of thirty human molars were used. They were divided into six groups: group 1, 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE); group 2, Er:YAG laser (KEY Laser 3, KaVo) + Single Bond 2; group 3, Er:YAG laser + 37% H3PO4 + Single Bond 2; group 4, Clearfil SE Primer + Bond (Kuraray); group 5, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Bond; group 6, Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Primer + Bond. The samples were subjected to microSBS testing 24 hr after bonding. Also scanning microscopic evaluations were made on the resin-dentin interfaces of six specimens. RESULTS: The microSBS of group 2 was significantly lower than that of groups 1 and 3 in Single Bond 2 (p < 0.05). There were significant differences among the uSBS of groups 4, 5, and 6 in Clearfil SE Bond (p < 0.05). Very short and slender resin tags were observed in groups 2 and 5. Long and slender resin tags and lateral branches of tags were observed in groups 3 and 6. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of dentin surface using phosphoric acid or self-etching primer improved the adhesion of Er:YAG lased dentin.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.