Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jun;34(2):91-97. Korean. Original Article.
Jeong HJ , Cho BH , Jung YH .
Department of oral and maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Korea. bhjo@pusan.ac.kr
Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of both planar and SPECT imagings by comparing the results with the clinical and other imaging modalities findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 578 joints with TMJ complaints were examined using planar scintigraphy and SPECT. The planar scintigraphy and SPECT findings were analyzed and compared to the clinical findings of pain, clicking, crepitus and limitation of mouth opening. Moreover we compared the accuracy of the planar scintigraphy and SPECT methods with the one of the panoramic, transcranial, tomographic and MR imaging methods. RESULTS: The planar scintigraphy and SPECT methods showed a high sensitivity of 0.76-0.84 and low specificity of 0.25-0.45 toward the clinical findings: pain, clicking, crepitus and mouth opening restriction. Simple radionuclide uptake ratio was high in each group of patients with pain, crepitus, limitation of mouth opening (p< 0.05) complaints, in each group with positive bone changes on panoramic, transcranial or tomographic images, and in disc displaced group. CONCLUSION: Although both planar and SPECT imagings have limited specificity, these techniques are sensitive for detection of internal derangement of the TMJ.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.