Journal Browser Advanced Search Help
Journal Browser Advanced search HELP
J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2007 Dec;25(4):193-200. Korean. Original Article.
Yoon MS , Nam TK , Lee JH , Cho SH , Song JY , Ahn SJ , Chung IJ , Chung WK , Nah BS .
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. thnam@chonnam.ac.kr
Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the pretreatment expression patterns of MDM2, p53, and pRb proteins to determine if the expression patterns could predict the outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and aid in the decisions for the selection of treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients that were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for stage I~IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were selected for this study. Radiotherapy was administered with daily 1.8~2 Gy fractions up to a median dose of 54 Gy for primary tumors, and with four cycles of cisplatin/5- fluorouracil chemotherapy that was administered every 4 weeks, the first two cycles of which were administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Expression of MDM2, p53, and pRb was investigated by immunohistochemical analysis using pretreatment biopsy specimens. RESULTS: MDM2, p53, and pRb were detected with high immunoreactivity in 19.6%, 27.5%, and 66.7% of the patients, respectively. However, there was no significant correlation between expression of these factors and clinical outcome. By the use of multivariate analysis with nine covariates-age, tumor location, tumor length, stage, pathological response, clinical response, MDM2 expression, p53 expression, and pRb expression, only pathological response and stage were significant factors for cause-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Expression of MDM2, p53, and pRb was not found to be clinically significant for predicting outcomes after CCRT in this study. Further studies with a larger patient population and longer follow-up periods are needed to re-evaluate the expression pattern and to identify new predictors for CCRT response.

Copyright © 2019. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.