Yonsei Med J.  2007 Jun;48(3):360-370. 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.360.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: Review of the Short Form 36-Health Questionnaire Survey

• Ku JH

• KMID: 724089
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.360

Abstract

Advances in medical and rehabilitative care have increased interest in studying how different factors may affect the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). There has been a large increase in the number of studies assessing HRQOL among persons with SCI. However, despite these advances, numerous issues remain unanswered because these studies have used a variety of methodologic approaches and assessment tools to examine how different factors have a role in predicting HRQOL in SCI populations. Therefore, standardized instruments should be used as part of this process. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) was developed in order to survey health status of the general population. However, the available data on the HRQOL of individuals with SCI are currently limited. In addition, there is little information currently available on the factors that are associated with HRQOL in the SCI population and this issue remains controversial. The findings from several individual studies that used the SF-36 to assess the HRQOL of patients suffering from SCI were reviewed, and the results were interpreted with disability in mind. This review article aims to summarize the data regarding the HRQOL of individuals with SCI by using the SF-36.

Keyword

Spinal cord injury; quality of life; questionnaires; Short Form-36

MeSH Terms

Health Surveys
Humans
*Quality of Life
*Questionnaires
Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology/*psychology

Reference

1. Eisenberg MG, Saltz CC. Quality of life among aging spinal cord injured persons: long term rehabilitation outcomes. Paraplegia. 1991. 29:514–520.

2. Evans RL, Hendricks RD, Connis RT, Haselkorn JK, Ries KR, Mennet TE. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a literature critique and meta-analysis (1983-1992). J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1994. 17:60–66.

3. Hallin P, Sullivan M, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and quality of life measures: a review of instrument psychometric quality. Spinal Cord. 2000. 38:509–523.

4. Wood-Dauphinee S, Exner G, Bostanci B, Exner G, Glass C, Jochheim KA, et al. Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury--basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002. 20:135–149.

5. Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002. 83(12 Suppl 2):S18–S25.

6. Hammell KW. Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique. Spinal Cord. 2004. 42:491–502.

7. Dijkers MP. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005. 42(3 Suppl 1):87–110.

8. Post M, Noreau L. Quality of life after spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005. 29:139–146.

9. Decker SD, Schulz R. Correlates of life satisfaction and depression in middle-aged and elderly spinal cord-injured persons. Am J Occup Ther. 1985. 39:740–745.

10. Siosteen A, Lundqvist C, Blomstrand C, Sullivan L, Sullivan M. The quality of life of three functional spinal cord injury subgroups in a Swedish community. Paraplegia. 1990. 28:476–488.

11. Dunnum L. Life satisfaction and spinal cord injury: the patient perspective. J Neurosci Nurs. 1990. 22:43–47.

12. Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, Clearman R, Young ME. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992. 73:552–557.

13. Clayton KS, Chubon RA. Factors associated with the quality of life of long-term spinal cord injured persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994. 75:633–638.

14. Ville I, Ravaud JF. Tetrafigap Group. Subjective well-being and severe motor impairments: the Tetrafigap survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons. Soc Sci Med. 2001. 52:369–384.

15. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992. 30:473–483.

16. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplege A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998. 51:913–923.

17. Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999. 80:877–884.

18. Tate DG, Riley BB, Perna R, Roller S. Quality of life issues among women with physical disabilities or breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997. 78(12 Suppl 5):S18–S25.

19. Westgren N, Levi R. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998. 79:1433–1439.

20. Edwards L, Krassioukov A, Fehlings MG. Importance of access to research information among individuals with spinal cord injury: results of an evidenced-based questionnaire. Spinal Cord. 2002. 40:529–535.

21. Leduc BE, Lepage Y. Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2002. 24:196–202.

22. Forchheimer M, McAweeney M, Tate DG. Use of the SF-36 among persons with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004. 83:390–395.

23. Lucke KT, Coccia H, Goode JS, Lucke JF. Quality of life in spinal cord injured individuals and their caregivers during the initial 6 months following rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2004. 13:97–110.

24. Kreuter M, Siosteen A, Erkholm B, Bystrom U, Brown DJ. Health and quality of life of persons with spinal cord lesion in Australia and Sweden. Spinal Cord. 2005. 43:123–129.

25. Elfstrom M, Ryden A, Kreuter M, Taft C, Sullivan M. Relations between coping strategies and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal cord lesion. J Rehabil Med. 2005. 37:9–16.

26. Oh SJ, Ku JH, Jeon HG, Shin HI, Paik NJ, Yoo T. Health-related quality of life of patients using clean intermittent catheterization for neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. Urology. 2005. 65:306–310.

27. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000. 25:3130–3139.

28. Manocchia M, Bayliss MS, Connor J, Keller SD, Shiely JC, Tasai C, et al. SF-36 Health Survey Annotated Bibliography. 1998. Second Edition (1988-1996). Boston, MA: The Health Assessment Lab, New England Medical Center.

29. Guyatt GH. The philosophy of health-related quality of life translation. Qual Life Res. 1993. 2:461–465.

30. Calman KC. Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis. J Med Ethics. 1984. 10:124–127.

31. Conroy L, McKenna K. Vocational outcome following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999. 37:624–633.

32. DeVivo MJ, Hawkins LN, Richards JS, Go BK. Outcomes of post-spinal cord injury marriages. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995. 76:130–138.

33. DeVivo MJ, Whiteneck GC, Charles ED. Stover SL, DeLisa JA, Whiteneck GC, editors. The economic impact of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes from the Model Systems. 1995. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Institute;242–269.

34. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972. 107:458–461.

35. Weld KJ, Dmochowski RR. Effect of bladder management on urological complications in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000. 163:768–772.

36. Schwartz CE. Teaching coping skills enhances quality of life more than peer support: results of a randomized trial with multiple sclerosis patients. Health Psychol. 1999. 18:211–220.